Dr. Hanan Polansky on the Radio, Explains How Foreign DNA Fragments in Vaccines Can Cause Disease

Yahoo

PRWeb

Dr. Hanan Polansky from the CBCD, used his discovery of microcompetition to explain the biological mechanism underlying the serious adverse events of Gardasil.

Rochester, New York (PRWEB) February 14, 2012

In a recent radio interview, Dr. Hanan Polansky from the Center for the Biology of Chronic Disease (CBCD) used his discovery of microcompetition to explain the biological mechanism underlying the serious adverse events of Gardasil, the HPV vaccine. The broadcast also featured Norma Erickson, President of SANE Vax Inc. and was hosted by Leslie Carol Botha.

A recording of the interview is available on the CBCD website at http://www.cbcd.net.

Dr. Hanan Polansky discovered that foreign DNA fragments called N-boxes can cause disease. When these foreign DNA fragments enter the body (naturally, or artificially, like through an injection of a vaccine or other treatments), they end up in the cell’s nucleus, where they attract scarce genetic resources. The “microcompetition” between the foreign N-boxes and the human N-boxes cause the human genes to malfunction, which, in turn, can lead to disease.

Dr. Hanan Polansky’s discovery has important implications. It suggests that by stopping or preventing microcompetition we can cure and prevent major diseases, such as cancer, heart disease, diabetes, autoimmune diseases, and even obesity.

Dr. Hanan Polansky is the author of the highly acclaimed “Purple” book, entitled “Microcompetition with Foreign DNA and the Origin of Chronic Disease.” In his book he explains how foreign DNA fragments can cause many major diseases without damaging (mutating) the human DNA. The book has been read by more than 5,000 scientists around the world, and has been reviewed in more than 20 leading scientific journals.

Ramji L. Khandelwal, PhD – Professor, Department of Biochemistry, University of Saskatchewan, Canada, said on the book: “This is an excellent book that provides published data from a very different perspective to formulate a generalized theory in terms of stable good health … I am confident that this theory will be validated with future work. It has already provided stimulus to my thinking, and so far, I agree with the basic concepts outlined in this book.”

The CBCD encourages biologists, virologists, geneticists and scientists and the general public to obtain a copy of Dr. Hanan Polansky’s book and read it. The book is available as a free download from the CBCD website.

The CBCD endorses Dr. Polansky’s theory, and invites the media, scientists, and the general public to contact us on this issue.

For more information on the Center for the Biology of Chronic Disease, or to schedule an interview with Dr. Polansky, please visit http://www.cbcd.net or call 585-250-9999.

The Center for the Biology of Chronic Disease (CBCD, http://www.cbcd.net) is a research center recognized by the IRS as a 501(c)(3) non-for-profit organization. The mission of the CBCD is to advance the research on the biology of chronic diseases, and to accelerate the discovery of treatments for these diseases.

The CBCD published the “Purple” book entitled “Microcompetition with Foreign DNA and the Origin of Chronic Disease” written by Dr. Hanan Polansky. The book presents Dr. Polansky’s highly acclaimed scientific theory on the relationship between the DNA of latent (chronic) viruses and the onset of chronic diseases. Dr. Polansky’s book is available as a free download from the CBCD website.

We invite biologists, virologists, and scientists everywhere to download Dr. Polansky’s book.

###

John S. Boyd, PhD
CENTER FOR THE BIOLOGY OF CHRONIC DISEASE
(585) 250-9999
Email Information

 

Read More…

HPV Vaccine Victim’s Advocacy Group Sends Open Letter to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius

InfoWars.com

Curt Linderman Sr.
Infowars.com
February 3, 2012

As of Dec. 2011, there have been 24,610 documented adverse reactions associated with the HPV vaccines, 3,269 have been serious. Given the fact that data from the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) database and the National Vaccine Information Center claim that less than 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported, these numbers could be far more frightening.

Sane Vax, an HPV vaccine victim’s advocacy group (www.sanevax.org) recently sent an open letter to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius (1). In this letter and subsequent articles pertaining to HPV Vaccine injuries, it is explained that all drugs given a “fast track” or accelerated approval process through the Food and Drug Administration, are required to verify and prove the fast tracked drug is actually effective and safe through post marketing studies (2). Gardacil was one of those “fast tracked” drugs, despite the fact that I can’t seem to remember the epidemic of young women dropping in the streets, succumbing to cervical cancer. There was no reason to fast track such a vaccine. This kind of tactic should only be available for epidemic and pandemic viruses.

A recently published, and industry sponsored, study (3) conducted on 12,852 young women seems to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that HPV vaccines are not working and even seem to be causing cancers! Gardacil and Cervarix, the two HPV vaccines manufactured at this time, only vaccinate for a small number of the human papillomavirus strains and in this study, suggest that HPV vaccination was found to reduce HPV-16 infections by a mere 0.6% in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated women.

Sane Vax states that, in the very same study, 2.6% to 6.2% more HPV vaccinated young women experienced other high risk (carcinogenic) HPV infections than unvaccinated women! When one considers the drastic numbers of adverse reactions, the lack of proof that any post marketing studies are showing success for the vaccines and the outcry from parents regarding draconian measures from governments to force girls (and now boys) to get vaccinated, Secretary Sebellius, the HHS and the FDA should immediately stop the HPV vaccine recommendations and forcibly remove the product from the market.

Why on earth would they continue to mandate these vaccines to our young girls and boys, given the facts that you, the reader, have available now? Given the PAP smears and other gynecological efforts made available to girls around the western world, this vaccine will end up being a nightmare. These girls, believing that the FDA and Secretary Sebellius have done their homework and the vaccine is both safe and effective, will believe they are protected and be less likely to go to the doctor for their checkups. This alone will cost numerous lives. Add to this, the evidence from this most recent study that vaccinated girls are getting more cancers, and you have a recipe for disaster.

Read Full Article…

Gardasil: Dr. Hanan Polansky Explains How the Foreign DNA Fragments Found in the Vaccine can Cause Disease

The FDA asserts that the foreign DNA fragments found in Gardasil pose no risk. In contrast, Dr. Hanan Polansky, from the Center for the Biology of Chronic Disease, uses his highly acclaimed discovery of Microcompetition to explain how these DNA fragments can cause major diseases.

PRWeb

Rochester, New York (PRWEB) February 04, 2012

Gardasil is the FDA approved HPV vaccine. As of September 15, 2011, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) received a total of 20,096 reports of adverse events in relation to Gardasil vaccination. Dr. Hanan Polansky, Director of the Center for the Biology of Chronic Disease, will discuss his discovery of Microcompetition with Norma Erickson, President of SANE Vax Inc. Dr. Polansky will use Microcompetition to explain the biological mechanism underlying the Gardasil adverse events. Leslie Carol Botha will host the event on the Holy Hormones Radio Show. The show will be broadcast on the community radio station KRFC FM in Fort Collins, CO, Monday, February 6, from 6 to 7pm MST.

Dr. Hanan Polansky is the author of the highly acclaimed “Purple” book, entitled Microcompetition with Foreign DNA and the Origin of Chronic Disease. In his book he explains how foreign DNA fragments can cause many major diseases without damaging (mutating) the human DNA. The book has been read by more than 5,000 scientists around the world, and has been reviewed in more than 20 leading scientific journals.

“Even if only a portion of the author’s (Dr. Hanan Polansky’s) thesis is correct, it would establish wholly new insights into the pathogenesis of chronic disease states, and would have significant implications for treatment and/or prevention.” – Kim E. Barrett, PhD – Professor of Medicine and Vice-Chair for Research, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine.

The FDA says on its website that “Since the early development of Gardasil, FDA and the manufacturer (Merck and Co., Inc.) have known that after purification of the vaccine, small quantities of residual recombinant HPV L1-specific DNA fragments remain in the vaccine.” … “The presence of DNA fragments is expected in Gardasil … these are not contaminants …. The presence of these DNA fragments is expected, is not a risk to vaccine recipients, and is not a safety factor.”

The FDA and Merck admit that Gardasil contains foreign DNA fragments. However, the FDA asserts that these foreign DNA fragments pose no risk. In contrast, Dr. Hanan Polansky, in his highly acclaimed “Purple” book explains how certain foreign DNA fragments, at high concentrations, cause major diseases, such as, cancer, heart disease, diabetes, autoimmune diseases, and even obesity even when the DNA is broken and not functioning.

Read the entire article here.

Facts known to vaccinators are not communicated to the consumer

 

January 24, 2012

Letter to the Editor

In October, 2011 “Mercy” has published article by Dr. Joseph Mercola on Gardasil HPV vaccine from Merck produced by the company. A detailed analysis of the history of vaccines, clinical trials, promoting it on the market of pharmaceutical services, data on complications leads to the conclusion that the clinical efficacy of the vaccine and its safety are not only not proven facts, but also cause great doubt. Not to vaccinate their children against HPV, it can destroy the lives of your family – that is the inspiration of Dr. Mercola article. It seems to be told. What made ​​me come back to this topic?

Tracking materials on immunization, I always see pictures of girls, for whom the consequences of vaccination or Gardasilom Cervarix (human papillomavirus vaccine from GlaxoSmithKline company) have severe disability or death. Openly and trustfully look at it this world, a world so familiar and comfortable, because it designed to protect the lives of their adult: mom, dad, school teachers, college professors, the attending physician. The faithful, reliable, armed with professional knowledge, experience wise. They can feel safe. It’s unbearable to think that the adult world so cruelly summed up their children. Seeing the time, you can not forget the gentle face, accept the fact that the photographer captured moments when “still alive”, not to return.

22-year-old graduate of the College of Art in New York, a great athlete, a volunteer charitable programs of the local church, a member of the international organization “Amnesty” Christina Tarsell died in June 2008, 18 days after the third injection Gardasil. In February 2008, at the age of 18 years left cheerful and active Jessica Erickson of New York. It happened 2 days after the third dose of the same vaccine. 20-year-old student Shella Roberts of North Carolina, died in April 2008 after vaccination Gardasilom. At the age of 19 years died of pulmonary embolism on the 14th day after the first injection of Gardasil Brook Petkevitsius of Flordy. Alas, the list of women whose life was tragically cut short due to complications from vaccine injections can be continued. Another long list of those whose early years, and maybe even the whole of life, destroyed severe disabilities following the vaccination Gardasilom or Cervarix.

A nationwide vaccination program began Cervarix in the UK in September 2008. Already in the first year of the program more than 2,000 girls were complications of varying severity. In May 2009 the Sunday Express newspaper reported on 13-year-old Rebecca Ramadzh (Reigate, Surrey), who could not walk for 6 months because of inflammation in the joints. Her doctor had no doubt that the disease was the result of vaccination Cervarix .

A nationwide vaccination program began Cervarix in the UK in September 2008. Already in the first year of the program more than 2,000 girls were complications of varying severity. In May 2009 the Sunday Express newspaper reported on 13-year-old Rebecca Ramadzh (Reigate, Surrey), who could not walk for 6 months because of inflammation in the joints. Her doctor had no doubt that the disease was the result of vaccination Cervarix .

Lucy’s parents thirteen Hincks from Cumbria have heard of cases of complications after vaccination for girls from HPV, but they still decided in favor of vaccination. “I’m worried, because Lucy is very difficult underwent a triple vaccine against measles, rubella and mumps, but the nurse reassured me, assuring that the risk of complications is extremely low – says Pauline Hincks, his mother Lucy – we feel betrayed, because, as most parents, we believed that we can trust our official medicine in matters of life and health of our children. ” After vaccination, Lucy gradually lost the ability to move about the studies we have not discussed, although vaccination was the best girl student of class and won in competitions in mathematics. Lucy is constantly losing weight, sleeping 23 hours a day , and when waking up, then barely whispered a few words “pain in the toilet, tablet, water” and most of all – “Mom”.

Doctors protest, officials do not see a problem

Doctors in different countries look to their committees for vaccination to reconsider a decision to introduce vaccination against HPV immunization program in schools. A number of scientists believe that the alleged 70% protection against cervical cancer is a great exaggeration, and not based on any scientific data. In fact, this manipulation of parents who are trying all means to convince that this vaccination is necessary to their daughters.

In Germany, 13 professors of medicine with an impeccable reputation accused the vaccine manufacturers that they give false information. In particular, Professor Martin Doran (Charity Hospital, Berlin) announces: “Our concern is that the manufacturers of the vaccine manipulated the facts. They claim that the vaccine protects against many strains of the virus that causes cancer, but says nothing about the fact that there is a sufficient number of strains of the same virus from which it does not protect. ” Professor Doran said that the balance of benefits and risks from the vaccine manufacturers is distorted, and special concern is the fact that clinical trials of Cervarix were only in the age group 15 to 26 years. “Vaccinate girls 12-13 years in the absence of data on the safety of the vaccine for this age group is not only wrong from a medical standpoint, but also unethical.”

In the Netherlands, 6 girls were hospitalized after the injection of Cervarix, more than 500 were complications of varying severity. As a result of mass vaccination of resistance caused by its reactogenicity, only 49% of Dutch women made the first of three injections.

In February 2010, 80 000 doses of Cervarix has been withdrawn from hospitals in Valencia and the Balearic Islands after three girls were hospitalized with convulsions and loss of consciousness after a few hours after inoculation.

Unfortunately, neither the health authorities in Spain, nor the officials of Germany did not support the initiatives of their doctors and continue to recommend Cervarix for girls and vaccination of schoolgirls.

In October 2011, three Parisian doctor turned to the National Assembly of France with a call to delete from the list of Gardasil approved for use of drugs and to suspend the certification of the vaccine in Europe, as there are serious doubts about its safety and effectiveness. Gynecologist, Jean-Pierre Spinoza, author of “Why do we vaccinate girls against cervical cancer?” Says Aluminium, contained as an adjuvant in the vaccine Gardasil, is a known neurotoxin, and therefore should not be part of the vaccine. Doctors also find unacceptable the practice of certification of medical products if the administrative authorities of the European Union follow the recommendations of the Administration for quality control and Drug Administration USA (FDA), without conducting its own tests.

The conflict between the policy of silence and evidence-based medicine

December 22, 2011 in the “Annals of Medicine” appeared Tomlenovich article Lucy and Christopher Shaw , scientists from the University of British Columbia (Vancouver, Canada), “Human papillomavirus: the conflict between the policy of vaccination and evidence-based medicine?” That’s what Canadian experts wrote: “Methods of promotion HPV vaccine shows that are not always facts known vaccinators will be communicated to the consumer. For example, the world’s leading medical organizations claim that a vaccine against HPV is an important tool to prevent cervical cancer, while there were no such clinical trials that would demonstrate that the vaccine actually protects against cancer. Further, in contrast to the assertion that cervical cancer is the second most common type of cancer among women worldwide, real-world data suggest that this is true only for developing countries. In the Western world, cervical cancer is a rare disease with mortality rates several times lower than the level registered in the system of notification of serious complications (including fatal cases) from those considered vaccines. Future vaccination strategies should be firmly rooted in evidence-based medicine and the ethical principle of informed consent. “

In his article, Dr. Mercola gives the list of complications after vaccination Gardasilom. The list is not complete, but, nonetheless, impressive. And here is a new and absolutely astonishing fact : the American system of warning about the complications of vaccination (VAERS) from August to December 2011 among 24 601 Complications of Gardasil registered 471 cases of deviation from the norm in the analysis for HPV, 181 cases of cervical dysplasia (precancerous state) and 47 cases of cervical cancer! That is, complications from vaccination are those very diseases from which she, according to the manufacturers and public health agencies, provides reliable protection.

Health activists from the organization Sane Vax, Inc. (“For a reasonable vaccination”) decided to conduct its own investigation . They took 13 vials of Gardasilom from different parties, to be sold in the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Spain, France and Poland. Laboratory analysis showed that all 13 doses of recombinant DNA of HPV. In September 2011 Norma Erickson, president of Sane Vax, sent a letter to the U.S. Administration for Quality Control of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) c to draw their attention to this fact as a possible cause of serious complications after vaccination Gardasilom, such as leukemia, lymphoma, rheumatoid arthritis, human papillomavirus infection as such, a cancer of the cervix. “The 13-year-old girl, sexually innocent, 24 hours after the third injection Gardasil developed symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis, and two years later when the blood test it was discovered papillomavirus – wrote Erickson – because 100% of the samples contained HPV DNA, Sane Vax, Inc. asked the Administration for Quality Control of Food and Drug Administration to investigate the extent of infection already on the market, lots of vaccine Gardasil and take measures to ensure the security of future supplies of vaccine. ”

In his reply to Norma Erickson on September 23, 2011 Head of Relations with consumers Walter Gardner reported that the presence of recombinant DNA of HPV in the vaccine Gardasil is to be expected and not harmful to the recipients. Also, the FDA had not heard, not seen and do not know anything about the connection of child rheumatoid arthritis vaccine against HPV.

Most of all, the answer affects the calculation that the policy of double default in some way can transform a lie into the truth and thus convince the recipient. But if you believe that recombinant DNA is not a risk factor, then why in the documents to the FDA and the manufacturer’s information leaflet (Norm Erikson cites official documents of the number 8) states that Gardasil “does not contain the DNA of the virus?” If we are talking exclusively about the natural DNA, not recombinant, then why in the information leaflet for the vaccine does not indicate that Gardasil, among others, contains the components of the recombinant DNA of HPV? And how about the fact that in the patent US № 6,602,697, issued to Merck on Gardasil, it is argued that the vaccine free of biomolecules, including the DNA, lipids and proteins? Why is it that the FDA, according to the text message of Mr. Gardner, do not know about that as a result of clinical trials of Gardasil found that vaccinated patients fell ill with rheumatoid arthritis is 3 times more likely than patients of the control group? But this is data from the manufacturer, not from the registration system complications. After that, not surprisingly, that health officials are not familiar with the research, describing “the mechanism of virus free delivery of the gene” , which is triggered by ingestion of human recombinant DNA. Enough integration of a single functional unit of the foreign DNA into the cellular genome of the recipient in order to began the transformation of cells. But apparently, the officials did not read the medical literature and believe (or pretend to believe) that the recombinant DNA of the virus does not pose a risk to those they will be introduced in the vaccine.

And what about us?

And we have – best of all. The value of pi in our country comes up to 4, the number of voters at polling stations – up to 146%, and the effectiveness of Gardasil, according to the information of medical centers offering vaccination against human papillomavirus, is practically equal to 100%.

As mentioned above, scientists believe that 70 percent efficiency, according to the manufacturer , is a great exaggeration. But no, we have 100%.

Vaccination against HPV is not included in the RF schedule immunizations for school children, and besides, she is paid to patients. Because of this coincidence, Gardasil and Cervarix have not so far that no binding, nor popular. No exact statistics, but apparently, the percentage of grafted these vaccines in Russia has been slow. But things can change very quickly: first, Cervarix will soon begin to produce in Russia outside Moscow at the facilities of CJSC “Binnofarm” , and secondly, the intention is to high health officials to introduce this vaccine in the childhood vaccination schedule.

I am very anxious for our children.

 

Marina Solodovniko

Original Article Here…. http://miloserdie.ru/index.php?ss=1&s=8&id=16583

Excuse Me Waiter – There’s a Fly in My Vaccine Soup!

Vac Truth

By | January 21st, 2012 |

 

 

We can laugh at the waiter’s reply to our complaint about the fly in our soup:   “- Never mind, it won’t eat much!”  However it is no joke that vaccines may contain residue from insect cells, yeast, mouse brains, tissue from pigs, guinea pigs, rabbits, dogs, calf lymph, hens’ eggs, chick embryos, monkey kidney and testicle cells, retinal cells, aborted human fetal cells and cancer cells!

These are amongst the many substrates present in the huge cultivation soup tanks which are used in vaccine production.  The implications may be horrendous.


DNA RESIDUE IN VACCINES

The presence in the final vaccines of residue (“adventitious agents”) including cells and fragments of DNA from foreign tissue is certainly realistic.

CDC ADMITS THE PROBLEM

“- Many novel vaccines are produced in animal cell substrates, and emerging infectious diseases may theoretically be transmitted from animals to humans through these vaccines. The challenge of identifying potential adventitious agents in vaccines closely parallels the challenge of identifying the agents causing particular emerging infectious diseases.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2631857/pdf/11485673.pdf

The concept of unknown ingredients in vaccines is at least as frightening as the ones which are known. Some substances are unknown even to vaccine manufacturers. As analysis methods become more advanced, more substances are discovered unexpectedly in vaccines which may have been on the market for a long time.

CANCER CAUSING MONKEY VIRUS SV40  IN POLIO VACCINE

One  example of many is the unexpected discovery of SV40 from monkey kidney cells  which was one of several dozen viruses that contaminated the original Salk and Sabin polio vaccines administered to millions of people worldwide.

“- it has been alleged that there have been SV40- contaminated batches of oral polio vaccine administered to some children until the end of the 1990’s.” http://www.sv40foundation.org/

The tragic story of little Alexander:

http://www.ouralexander.org/sv40.htm

SV40 VIRUS IS PASSED THROUGH GENERATIONS

“- many of the contaminant organisms can pass from generation to generation. For example, new studies have found that SV-40, a major contaminant of the polio vaccine until 1963, not only existed as a latent virus for the lifetime of those exposed to the vaccine but was being passed on to the next generation, primarily by way of sperm, something called vertical transmission. This means that every generation from now on will be infected with this known carcinogenic virus. There is also compelling evidence that some polio vaccines manufactured after 1963 may contain SV-40 virus. What makes the SV-40 contamination disaster of such concern is its association with so many cancers…” http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/if-you-are-in-support-of-vaccinations/

FDA ADMITS THAT SV40 CAUSES CANCER

“ – Millions received SV40-contaminated pRhMK-produced polio and adenovirus vaccines in the late 50s and early 60s”.

“SV40 DNA has been detected in some human malignancies…” http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3750s1_04_krause.pdf

 
PIG, MONKEY AND BIRD VIRUSES

Other examples of contamination include the unexpected discovery of pig virus DNA in the rotavirus vaccine GlaxoSmithKline’s “Rotarix”, a virus similar to simian (monkey) retrovirus in Merck’s rotavirus vaccine “Rotateq” and  retrovirus avian (bird) leukosis virus in a measles vaccine. http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/04/17/major-vaccine-suspended-due-to-contamination-with-pig-virus.aspx

BIOHAZARD RECOMBINANT (GENETICALLY MODIFIED) HPV DNA  IN GARDASIL

The consequences of the recent discovery by an independent laboratory of the presence of recombinant HPV DNA in Gardasil, considered a biohazard, are unknown and may be horrific.

“- If recombinant HPV DNA attached to aluminum adjuvant enters a person’s blood, how long will it remain there?”

“ – What autoimmune-related disorders could result from this contamination?”

“ – Is it possible for this contamination to initiate gene mutations which may lead to cancer?”

“ – What genetic changes (mutagenesis) could occur should the residual HPV DNA enter and begin reproducing in a human cell?”

http://sanevax.org/sane-vax-to-fda-recombinant-hpv-dna-found-in-multiple-samples-of-gardasil/

http://sanevax.org/fda-information-on-gardasil-betrayal-of-the-public-trust

http://sanevax.org/sane-vax-inc-announces-the-discovery-of-viral-hpv-dna-contaminant-in-gardasil

 

Read Full Article…

Medical journal openly questions science, ethics of HPV vaccinations

Natural News

January 13, 2o11
by Norma Erickson and Leslie Carol Botha, SANE Vax Inc.

On January 12, 2011 the Annals of Medicine published a ground-breaking peer-reviewed paper titled, Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine policy and evidence-based medicine: Are they at odds?, 1written by renowned researchers Lucija Tomljenovic, Ph.D.,and Christopher Shaw, Ph.D., with the Neural Dynamics research Group, University of British Columbia, in Vancouver. 2.

The article points out to the medical community what most consumers now know about the fraudulent global health agency policies in combination with the pharmaceutical companies lack of science based evidence demonstrating the safety and efficacy of Gardasil and Cervarix before they were unleashed on unsuspecting parents of adolescents.

Clinical Trials on Healthy People vs. Mass Vaccination Campaigns

Tomljenovic and Shaw clearly state the obvious in their abstract by stating that vaccines represent ‘a special category of drugs generally given to healthy individuals and therefore a small level of risk for adverse reactions is acceptable.’

Merck’s clinical trials were flawed because they used an aluminum adjuvant as a ‘placebo’ and only used saline as a comparative for minor, non-serious adverse reactions. With serious adverse reactions, they pooled the results from the saline group and the aluminum ‘placebo’ group. By doing this, they concealed the true rate of serious reactions.

If FDA approved drugs and vaccines were as safe and effective as Pharma would like consumers to believe the risk level should be negligible to none. The FDA removal of drugs after they have been on the market and damaged desperate people looking for cures who then have to file lawsuits to recover damages is simply unacceptable.

Medical Ethics Questioned

The authors also point out the myth of informed consent – basically a waiver signed by medical consumers that they have been ‘educated’ about the risk vs. benefit ratio of the drug about to be administered. Tomljenovic and Shaw open their paper citing that ‘medical ethics demand that vaccination be carried out with the participant’s full and informed consent’ and not just the handing out of the HPV vaccine Patient Product Insert – prepared by none other than the vaccine’s manufacturer.

What the authors do not cover in this paper is what happens to informed consent when governments grant children the right to consent to medical procedures, such as California’s recent passage of AB 499 – basically granting parental rights of children ages 12 and older to the state for the treatment of STD’s. Is it really because the ‘state’ knows better – or is it because legislatures have been paid off by the pharmaceutical companies?

The authors go on to state:

“What is more disconcerting than the aggressive marketing strategies employed by the vaccine manufacturers is the practice by which the medical profession has presented partial information to the public, namely, in a way that generates fear, thus promoting vaccine uptake………It thus appears that to this date, medical and regulatory entities worldwide continue to provide inaccurate information regarding cervical cancer risk and the usefulness of HPV vaccines, thereby making informed consent regarding vaccination impossible to achieve.”

Money Talks – Nobody Walks – but the Vaccine Injured

According to Maplight California – a web site that reveals money’s influence on politics, contributions from interest groups to CA legislators who supported the bill were $2,174,648 – more than 28 times the $76,404 given to interest groups who opposed the bill.It is also interesting to note that republican based groups and pro-life groups were on the dissenting side vs. the overwhelming number of liberal and democratic groups supporting the bill.

Similar bills are now in front of South Carolina and Florida legislatures. We are now personal witnesses to the erosion of medical ethics encouraged by politicians abundantly rewarded with special interest contributions.

Tomljenovic and Shaw continue their message by reminding medical professionals that ‘contrary to claims that cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide, existing data show that this only applies to developing countries. In the Western world cervical cancer is a rare disease with mortality rates that are several times lower than the rate of reported serious adverse reactions (including deaths) from HPV vaccination.’

The author’s state – what should become the mantra of all medical practitioners and consumers concerned about vaccine safety and efficacy:

Future vaccination policies should adhere more rigorously to evidence-based medicine and ethical guidelines for informed consent.

Tomljenovic and Shaw cite these key messages:

- To date, the efficacy of HPV vaccines in preventing cervical cancer has not been demonstrated, while vaccine risks remain to be fully evaluated.

- Current worldwide HPV immunization practices with either of the two HPV vaccines appear to be neither justified by long-term health benefits nor economically viable, nor is there any evidence that HPV vaccination (even if proven effective against cervical cancer) would reduce the rate of cervical cancer beyond what Pap screening has already achieved.

- Cumulatively, the list of serious adverse reactions related to HPV vaccination worldwide includes deaths, convulsions, paraesthesia, paralysis, Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), transverse myelitis, facial palsy, chronic fatigue syndrome, anaphylaxis, autoimmune disorders, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolisms, and cervical cancers.

- Because the HPV vaccination programme has global coverage, the long-term health of many women may be at risk against still unknown vaccine benefits.

- Physicians should adopt a more rigorous evidence-based medicine approach, in order to provide a balanced and objective evaluation of vaccine risks and benefits to their patients.

- The almost exclusive reliance on manufacturers’ sponsored studies, often of questionable quality, as a basis for vaccine policy-making should be discontinued.

- Greater efforts should be made to minimize the undue commercial influences on academic institutions and medical research, as this influence may impede unbiased scientific inquiry into important questions about vaccine science and policies.

- Passive adverse event surveillance should be replaced by active surveillance to better understand the true risks associated with vaccines, particularly new vaccines.

The abstract of Tomljenovic and Shaw’s paper, Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine policy and evidence-based medicine: Are they at odds? is posted on the SANE Vax Inc. web site. The entire paper can be accessed via this link on or after January 12. Share the 12-page paper with your medical practitioner, school nurses, and boards of education considering enforcing state legislation, and parents or guardians considering HPV vaccination for their child. Should you have difficulty accessing the entire paper you may contact the corresponding author via email at lucijat77@gmail.com.

The entire paper can be accessed via this link on or after January 12. Share the 12-page paper with your medical practitioner, school nurses, and boards of education considering enforcing state legislation, and parents or guardians considering HPV vaccination for their child.

Medical consumers need to demand the healthcare industry stop focusing on ‘drug policies’ and direct efforts toward uncovering science-based evidence to identify those actually at risk for the disease. As Tomljenovic and Shaw readily point in their dissertation on the HPV vaccine, the risk of cervical cancer is relatively small to justify a mandatory mass vaccination program with vaccines of questionable safety.

SaneVax Inc. views the presentation of partial and/or non-factual information regarding cervical cancer risks and the usefulness of HPV vaccines, as cited above, to be neither scientific nor ethical. These practices do not serve public health interests, nor are they likely to reduce the levels of cervical cancer. Independent evaluation of HPV vaccine safety is urgently needed and should be a priority for government-sponsored research programs.

Sources:

1.Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine policy and evidence-based medicine: Are they at odds?, Annals of Medicine,
http://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/ebm/record/22188159/full_citation/Human_papillomavirus__HPV__vaccine_policy_and_evidence_based_medicine:_Are_they_at_odds

2. Maplight California -AB 499 – An Act to Amend Section 6926 of the Family Code, Relating to Minors
http://maplight.org/california/bill/2011-ab-499/1007609/total-contributions

Read More…

Saskatchewan Ministry of Health Persistence with HPV Vaccine Perplexing

By Fr. Jeffrey Stephaniuk, SPLA Blog Editor

VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) data suggests that HPV4 (Gardasil) is the most frequently reported vaccine.” (www.sanevax.org)

It’s back to school time again.  Parents of any generation, current or past, have fond memories of attachment to their children when it comes to this time of year, long after they lose their innocence or their relationship with each other becomes strained.  There are the school supply lists, the new clothes, decisions about sports, and something new for the modern family, yet another letter from the local health region complaining, or rather, reminding you that your daughter has not been immunized against HPV. 

Caution among parents leads to HPV Vaccine “Re-offer”

The pressure tactic is tactfully cushioned in reminders of the benefits:  “it’s free!” Health benefits of the vaccine considered or not, the public health nurse here in Wadena tried that on me a few years ago.  Even doctors have suggested it, as a high profile adverse reaction case in Australia illustrates: Chescia Kimberley Tunley of Sidney, Australia, began the first of her doses, he father states, because the family doctor suggested it since “the free vaccinations were due to cease as of 30 June 2009.” http://sanevax.org/chescia-from-sydney/

My letter of reminder came from the health region but was endorsed by Dr. Ross Findlater, Deputy Medical Health Officer and Sarah Sundquist, Immunization Program Manager.  They state that currently there is “a 58% coverage rate for HPV vaccine” in Saskatchewan, and present this warning:  “With a low HPV immunization coverage rate in Canada, fewer women will be protected from cancer in our community.”  Their mission, short of making the shot mandatory, is to “re-offer this safe and effective vaccine to girls in Saskatchewan.”  Mercifully, even if viewed by health professionals with skepticism, parental authorization still means something legally speaking on the topic of vaccinations, unlike its scandalous absence on parental consent for underage abortion. 

Regarding the continued “re-offer” to immunize your daughter with Gardasil, parents need to take the active step of writing “refuse immunization” on the consent form, according to Dr. Findlater, and the “refusal will be documented in the Saskatchewan Immunization Management System.”  On the back of the consent form, the public health staff are asked to register the refusal as a “Philosophical Objection”, although “Objection on Scientific Grounds” would be more appropriate.  Even then, like a constant cloud of worry over your head that some disease might relapse out of remission, if “your daughter chooses to be immunized later on, contact public health for an appointment.”

Life-threatening reactions admitted by Saskatchewan Ministry of Health

One reason for the “low HPV immunization coverage” is the way people feel after their first dose, and they do not go back for their second or third doses.  On the Saskatchewan Ministry of Health HPV fact sheet, under the category, “Who should not get the vaccine?” they admit that people “who have had a life-threatening reaction to a previous dose of the vaccine, or to any of the vaccine components” should not get the shot.

According to Leslie Carol Botha, Health Educator and Vice-President Public Relations, SANE VAX Inc, (safe, affordable, necessary, and effective vaccines)

No one will know for 20 years or more whether the vaccine will have any impact on cervical cancer. But we do know two things; a high proportion of women do not have their 2nd or 3rd dose. Is this because their experience with the first or second dose may well have influenced this decision? As well and potentially far worse is that as Gardasil has been misleadingly promoted as a cancer vaccine – no one knows how many women will no longer continue with pap smears which could lead to a rapid increase in cervical cancer in the years ahead. http://sanevax.org/wp content/uploads/2011/09/HPV-Timeline.pdf

Kelsey Trail Health Region, for one, promotes the HPV vaccine as a cancer vaccine.  In a “Did You Know?” section of KTHR Pulse, from September 2008, for example, they announce, “Saskatchewan is spending $2.9 million this year for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. These vaccines protect women from cervical cancer.”  (View document here.)

As Leslie Carol Botha writes, a “vaccine for cancer has been created and distributed to millions of people around the world – yet vaccines don’t cure cancer.” Since 2010, the government of France has refused to allow HPV vaccines to be marketed as cancer preventatives. France becomes the first Western government to recognize that HPV vaccines are NOT a cancer cure!”

Anecdotally, my experience has been that the HPV vaccine is promoted because the pap test is underutilized.  At a trade show in Melfort one year, I asked our MLA and a local doctor who were together at the MLA’s booth, why provincial and federal funds were being used to get Gardasil into Saskatchewan girls. While the MLA, Rod Gantefoer, replied that it must be done because “no one can impose their morality on anyone else,” Dr. Lavoie informed me in no uncertain terms that because colleagues of his have found that “the Haitian immigrant population in Montreal underutilizes the pap test system, we need the HPV vaccine in Saskatchewan.” 

Read the entire article here.

Gardasil HPV Vaccines Found Contaminated with Recombinant HPV DNA

By Eddie Sage, majortrend.tv

In seeking answers to why adolescent girls are suffering devastating health damage after being injected with HPV vaccines, SANE Vax, Inc decided to have vials of Gardasil tested in a laboratory. There, they found over a dozen Gardasil vaccine vials to be contaminated with rDNA of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV). The vials were purchased in the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Spain, Poland and France,indicating Gardasil contamination is a global phenomenon.

This means that adolescents who are injected with these vials are being contaminated with a biohazard – the rDNA of HPV. In conducting the tests, Dr. Sin Hang Lee found rDNA from both HPV-11 and HPV-18, which were described as “firmly attached to the aluminum adjuvant.”

That aluminum is also found in vaccines should be frightening all by itself, given that aluminum should never be injected into the human body (it’s toxic when ingested, and it specifically damages the nervous system). With the added discovery that the aluminum adjuvant also carries rDNA fragments of two different strains of Human Papillomavirus, this now reaches the level of a dangerous biohazard – something more like a biological weapon rather than anything resembling medicine.

As SANE Vax explains in its announcement, these tests were conducted after an adolescent girl experienced “acute onset Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis within 24 hours” of being injected with an HPV vaccine.

Read the entire article here.

The Jeff Allan Show: Bio-hazard Found in Gardasil Vaccine

Broadcast on 570NewsRadio

leslie-botha

Leslie Carol Botha

A bio-hazard has been found in the HPV vaccination Gardasil. The HPV vaccine only protects against two strains of HPV associated with cancer but there are more than 100 different strains of HPV. The HPV vaccine is not as harmless as its being promoted and has not been proven to actually prevent cervical cancer. Guest: Leslie Carol Botha, VP of Public Relations for S.A.N.E. Vax Inc. Question: Would you or have you let your girls get the treatment? 10:30am King Street Revitalization Award. The City of Kitchener won gold in the Urban Design Category at the Design Exchange Awards. Guest: Cory Bluhm, Manager of Downtown Community Development. Question: Is Kitchener a better place for this?

Listen to the show via this link.

 

 

 

FDA Sells Out Your Health In Support of Merck and Gardasil HPV Vaccine

By Admin, Aware Prepare and Prosper

A while back we shared with you some information which the folks at SaneVax uncovered about Viral HPV DNA contaminant found in the Gardasil HPV Vaccine.  This is a problem and DOES post a health threat because aside from the DNA being attached to aluminum which has an affinity for the brain and has been implicated in issues of alzhemiers and neuro degeneration?

‘Recombinant DNA’ is a DNA that has been artificially attached to DNA from another species or a man-made DNA construct, in other words, genetically modified.  ‘Recombinant DNA,’ also known as genetically modified DNA, is considered a biohazard.  This is what states, drug companies, doctors and other medical professionals what you to inject into your children.

Now, the FDA thinks it’s ok, and does not post a threat to your health.

Read the entire article here.

Pharma Videos

cervarix 2

Vaccine Groups

center-for-personal-rights-logo

SaneVax Press Releases

SANE Vax logo