September 27, 2010 Center for Personal Rights The Science, Ethics and Politics of Vaccine Mandates (when you assume that vaccines are safe) Written by Louise Habakus BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY This is a long post but I encourage you to read my remarks. Compulsory vaccination represents a severe limitation of our human, civil, individual and parental […]
The Age of Autism
The Huffington Post
Deirdre Imus
Founder, Deirdre Imus Environmental Center for Pediatric Oncology
Posted: September 20, 2010 11:56 AM
The new book “The Age of Autism: Mercury, Medicine, and a Man-made Epidemic” is shaking up the autism world. Orthodox scientists and medical groups have dismissed and even ridiculed the idea that incredibly toxic ethyl mercury — still in flu shots given to infants and pregnant women — could be linked to the explosion in autism rates beginning in the 1990s, when the vaccine schedule was rapidly expanded. Just the day before the book came out this week, the CDC issued yet another flawed study that found not only was mercury safe — it actually had a protective effect against the risk of autism. This is obviously absurd, as is the fact that almost all the children in the study had received mercury-containing shots, rather than including a control group without any mercury exposure. Authors Dan Olmsted and Mark Blaxill — two names well-known in the autism community and editors of the blog Age of Autism (ageofautism.com), have for the first time traced the roots of autism beginning in the 1930s. What they found is electrifying and suggests the debate is about to heat up again, whether the government and medical industry like it or not.
Deirdre: What is the major point you want people to take away from your book?
Dan: That the concern about mercury and autism is far from over. We found that the medical industry and manufacturing have had a long history of the reckless use of mercury that goes back centuries, and that does include, based on our research, the rise of autism in the 1930s when ethyl mercury was first commercialized in agricultural products and in vaccines. That’s the short answer.
Hidden government papers expose lies about measles vaccines for infants
Natural News
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 by: David Gutierrez, staff writer
British government policy on measles vaccination for children has changed for no discernible reason notes Christina England, writing on vactruth.com, citing an internal document from 1968.
The document, titled “Notes On the Use and Storage of Measles Vaccine (Live Attenuated) for Routine Vaccines,” clearly states in Section 7 that the vaccine should not be given to children under the age of nine months old. According to the paper’s authors, the presence of maternal antibodies in the blood of such children interferes with the action of the vaccine, making it ineffective. Instead, the government recommended vaccination at the age of two after vaccination for diptheria, polio, tetanus and whooping cough.
Countries, Mandated/Recommended Vaccines for Children Under Age 5, and Mortality Rates of Children Under Age 5
Gaia-Health
The following pages contain three tables with the same data presented, differing only in terms of how it’s ordered.
Table 1 lists countries alphabetically.
Table 2 lists countries in order of recommended or mandated vaccinations for children under age 5.
Table 3 lists countries in order of mortality rates
of children under age 5.
_____________________
Note: All vaccine schedules are as of 2006. Some countries use combination vaccines. All schedule counts have been normalized to compare to the US schedule. For example, if a country uses an MMR-Varicella combination vaccine, it counts as 2 vaccines.
Natural Infectious Disease Declines; Immunization Effectiveness: and Immunization Dangers
SYNOPTIC OVERVIEW:
ISSUES IN IMMUNIZATION THEORY AND PRACTICE
Prepared by: Raymond Obomsawin Ph.D.
October 2009
FIGURE SET 1. Natural Infectious Disease Declines Preceding Public Immunization Efforts
Figures one (I) through ten (IO) graphically illustrate that in North America, Europe, and the South Pacific, major declines in life-threatening infectious diseases occurred historically either without, or far in advance of public immunization efforts for specific diseases as listed. This provides irrefutable evidence that vaccines are not necessary for the effective elimination of a wide range of infectious diseases
FIGURE SET II. Immunization Effectiveness
Figures eleven (11) through nineteen (19) graphically illustrate that immunization is not by any means a proven and foolproof measure for protection from various infectious disease conditions. It is often inconsequential epidemiologically, and in some cases it is shown to actually worsen health-care outcomes.
FIGURE SET III. Immunization Dangers
Figures twenty (20) through twenty-nine (29) graphically illustrate that increases in the number of government mandated vaccines correlates with significant increases in death rates for children under the age of five (5); and that the practice is linked to sudden infant death syndrome; various degenerative diseases, including diabetes; and appears to cause general immune system impairment in infants and children. Evidence also points to the practice of immunization as a principal factor in the recent massive increases in neurodegenerative conditions such as autism in children.