Gardasil: Is there a legitimate reason for safety concerns?

[SaneVax: CDC representatives have spent the last month or so complaining about the pitifully low uptake of Gardasil in the United States while stressing how ‘safe and effective’ this relatively new vaccine has ‘proven’ itself to be. Medical consumers are not convinced. Less than one-third of those eligible for the vaccine have taken even one Gardasil injection, much less all three recommended doses. Is this because of irrational fear, or legitimate safety concerns?]

Most Gardasil ‘safety’ data discovered to be fraudulent

By Jonathan Benson, staff writer

Gardasil: safe or scandalous?

Gardasil: safe or scandalous?

(NaturalNews) Every time a new scientific study is published with regards to a  vaccine or a dietary supplement, the mainstream media is quick to praise the  former and denounce the latter without ever actually reading the study in  question, let alone critically analyzing it to get an honest grasp of its true  implications. One prominent example of this is the human papillomavirus (HPV)  vaccine Gardasil, which mainstream media outlets have repeatedly touted as safe  and effective using mounds of fraudulent, misinterpreted, and sometimes  never-even-looked-at “safety” data.

Recently, a surveillance study  evaluating the potential autoimmune side effects of Gardasil was used by the  mainstream media as “evidence” that the vaccine is supposedly not linked  to such conditions, and is thus safe, even though the study did not actually  come to this conclusion. As reported by Dr. Chandler Marrs, Ph.D., from  HormonesMatter.com, the study itself was poorly conducted, it contains  obvious statistical skewing, it did not include a matched case control group,  and it truly did not come to any meaningful conclusions about Gardasil’s  safety.

But this did not stop the mainstream media from running wildly  deceptive headlines like “No increase in autoimmune conditions from use of HPV  vaccine” and “HPV vaccine unlikely triggered autoimmune disease,” which were  designed to trick the public into thinking that “science” somehow supports the  safety of Gardasil.

Read the entire article here.

Comments

  1. Sandy Lunoe says:

    In 2012 Gaia Health published an excellent article relating to a biased and skewed study concerning Gardasil and autoimmune reactions.
    http://gaia-health.com/gaia-blog/2012-02-15/farcical-study-of-gardasil-safety-medscape-gives-cme-training-credit-for-it/

    The obvious aim of the study was to convince doctors that autoimmune reactions are not caused by the vaccine.
    Medscape gave away a Continuing Medical Education (CME) online class in support of the study.

    The manipulated rubbish which was fed to doctors is utterly incredible It is obviously an advantage for doctors to comfortably collect easily earned credits in this way.

    To do this all that was required was to answer two multiple choice questions (the “hoped for” answers were printed above them).
    One question involved ticking the statement that the vaccine contains products of HPV types 6,11,16 and 18.
    The other involved ticking the statement that the vaccine does not appear to promote any incident autoimmune diseases.
    There were some voluntary questions where one could agree to statements such as that the study assists in improvement of my competence, performance, etc.

    Bingo – I attained 0.25 credits and a Medscape certificate for participation in the material titled:
    “Rate of Autoimmune Conditions Not Increased with HPV4 Use”.

    So now we have proof that Gardasil does not cause autoimmune conditions. Yes?

    • Sandy Lunoe says:

      Correction!
      The last sentence should read: “So now we have proof that Gardasil does not cause autoimmune conditions. Yes?”

  2. Sandy Lunoe says:

    Correction!
    The last sentence should read: “So now we have proof that Gardasil does not cause autoimmune conditions. Yes?”

  3. Godofredo says:

    INEFFICACY OF THE HPV VACCINE SEEN BY DOCTOR OF DEEP PERÚ
    From its inception until the appearance of uterine cervical carcinoma (UCC) takes a average of 20-30; the research of this vaccine have begun in 2000. It is evident that the scientific efficacy of this new vaccine will be determined the years 2025 – 2030.
    HPV not causes definitely the (CCU); at the onset of this disease involves multiple risk factors, including the suspected HPV, but scientifically is proven by epidemiology and statistics that the sex is what generates this disease. Nix in 100.000 nuns found not any UCC.
    http://www.portalesmedicos.com/publicaciones/articles/1832/1/Epidemiolog
    To accept that a virus or a bacteria causes a infection disease must unfailingly fulfill the five Koch’s postulate
    http://www.xatakaciencia.com/salud/los-postulados-de-koch
    1 – The agent must be present in every case of the disease and absent from healthy.
    2 – The agent must not appear in other diseases.
    3 – The agent to be isolated in pure culture from disease lesions.
    4 – The agent of causing disease in a susceptible animal being inoculated.
    5 – The agent must again be isolated lesions in experimental animals.
    http://es.scribd.com/doc/44558220/MICROBIOLOGIA-1
    Consequently, HPV not fulfill not any principle of Koch’s postulate. by not meeting this postulate, that is accepted as dogma in medicine, scientifically we must be ensure that the HPV is not the causative agent to the UCC..
    Until May 2013 Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting Syntem (VAERS) published that the vaccines against the HPV caused only in Unites States 138 muertes and 30020 adverse events; 947 disabled: 12 males, 924 females and 11sex unknown; 4050 advers graves: 106 males, 3883 females and 57 unknown sex; 527 abnormal PAP smears, 214 dysplasia cervical and cervical cancer 214. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System secure that only the !% to 10% are denounced https://dub104.mail.live.com/default.aspx#n=1521802 http://holyhormones.com/vaccinations/hpv-vaccine/hpv-vaccine-adverse-eve
    http://therefusers.com/?s=cervarix
    The Vaccine efects advers reactions (VAERS) ensures that only complaint between 1% to 10% of the adverse effects produced by this evil vaccine;this figures shown are calculated according to the statements of the VAERS: to 10%.
    http://www.noticiero.enkoria.com/2011/diez-menores-que-sufrieron-reaccio
    http://www.pop.org/content/merck-researcher-admits-gardasil-guards-again
    Dr. Harper, who contributed to the development of the vaccine by Merck, reports that the vaccine was not investigated in children under 15 years and the vaccine given to children under 11 years is a big public experiment.
    http://offtheradar.co.nz/vaccines/53-researcher-diane-harper-blasts-gard
    The vaccine was approved to give girls uncontaminated with HPV, Dr. Howenstinc ensures that the women are vaccinated with HPV contaminated, have the possibility to acquire a 44.6% CCU
    http://www.newswithviews.com / Howenstine/james170.htm.
    Merck did not disclose that the vaccine was transgenic, the Sane Vax has discovered, which is transgenic because it has been found that the vaccine is contaminated with DNA recombinant vaccine Gardasil (DNArPVH) and has raised its concerns to the president of the FDA Margaret Hamburg. The FDA replied that the vaccine will not cause any damage transgenic
    http://real-agenda.com/2011/09/16/vacuna-gardasil-contaminada-con-adn-re
    http://bolsonweb.com.ar/diariobolson/detalle.php?id_noticia=26075
    A vaccinated child was ill with rheumatoid arthritis, which is an autoimmune disease. 24 hours after vaccination and found that the aluminum adhered to DNArPVH, two years after vaccination and in autopsy 6 months after death in a New Zeland girl Jazmine Renata which had recibed this deadly vaccines
    http://www.mecfsforums.com/index.php?topic=9331.0
    Management time to get market approval of a drug the FDA is at least three years, it is a drug for cancer 15 years, but the authorization Merck had only six months and the European Medicines Agency (EMA in English) only 9 months: To introduce the vaccine are using the marketing of fear
    http://mujeresenaccion.over-blog.es/article-vph-la-vacuna-del-marketing-http://mujeresenaccion.over-blog.es/article-vph-la-vacuna -of-marketing-of-fear-67210961.ht
    HPV is ubiquitous; lives in wild and domestic animals, pollute us from birth, is on the doorknobs, on towels, on nails, on fomites, in gloves and specula of gynecologists,. sexual intercourse is not the only means of contamination.
    http://spa.myhealthygood.com/cancer-cervical-vacuna-contra-el-vph/invest
    HPV also lives in the 400 nm outermost of our skin and mucous membranes. ,
    If you live in our skin, our immune system produces cellular and humoral immunity is acquired or that our body is self vaccinatinge by PVHs living on our skin and mucous ..
    http://www.conganat.org/seap/bibliografia/HPVToday/HPVToday007SEAP.pdf
    The PVHs is not distributed uniformly worldwide. It has been found that in Canada HPV 18 only reaches 3%; is more often HPV 31, in my country Peru no studies have determined that HPV types predominate; Gardasil contains 225 mcg. aluminum and Cervarix 500 mcg, that produce the Alzheimer, Parkinson and autism, produce too neurotoxic and immune system disorders (Blaylock 2012) and Polisorbato 80, a powerful contraceptive, that in experimental animals produces sterility, atrophy of the testicles and disturbance organic and funtional of the organs of the reproduction; is carcinogenic and mutagenic; also contains sodium borate considered poison unused in medicinal preparations (NLM)
    http://www.telefonica.net/web2/paramahamsa/vacunaninosalerta.html http://detenganlavacuna.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/gardasil-cervarix/
    Have been discovered to date 200 types of HPV; HPV is not infectious, contagious; the intercourse is not only that the persons is contaminated
    http://quimicaclinicauv.blogspot.com/2006/08/virus-del-papiloma-humano.html http://www-lab.biomedicas.unam.mx/smpv/queeshpv.htm
    On 22-11-2010 FDA approved Gardasil for males aged 9 to 26 to prevent warts and cancer to the anus, is overkill
    http://real-agenda.com/2011/09/16/vacuna-gardasil-contaminada-con-adn-re
    http://salud.aollatino.com/2011/02/02/aprueba-fda-nueva-indicacion-vacun
    For the reasons from deep Peru Huancayo, I believe that this vaccine is a fraud?, a robbery?, a swindle?, a rough joke?, a crime?, a shame?
    The HPV is not scientifically proved for the moment that produce the UCC its effectiveness shall be verified just the years of 2025-2030.
    Dr. Godofredo Arauzo
    E mail: godo.ara@ gmail.com

Speak Your Mind

*

*