[SaneVax: June 25 2012, Chatom Primary Care filed a class action suit against Merck in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania alleging violations of the Anti-Trust Act by unlawfully monopolizing the U.S. market for mumps vaccine by “engaging in a decade long scheme to falsify and misrepresent the true efficacy of its vaccine. The suit also alleges violations of State Consumer Protection Laws, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty, and unjust enrichment.
It should be noted that Merck is the leading supplier of childhood vaccines, marketing vaccines for 12 of the 17 diseases for which the CDC recommends vaccination in the United States. The price of MMR vaccines have increased from $28.19 in 1999 to $52.07 in 2012. Unjust enrichment? Read all of the supporting documents in the article below and decide for yourself.]
Merck vaccine fraud exposed by two Merck virologists; company faked mumps vaccine efficacy results for over a decade, says lawsuit
By Mike Adams, The Health Ranger
(NaturalNews) Breaking news: According to two Merck scientists who filed a False Claims Act complaint in 2010 — a complaint which has just now been unsealed — vaccine manufacturer Merck knowingly falsified its mumps vaccine test data, spiked blood samples with animal antibodies, sold a vaccine that actually promoted mumps and measles outbreaks, and ripped off governments and consumers who bought the vaccine thinking it was “95% effective.”
See that False Claims Act document at:
www.naturalnews.com/gallery/documents/Merck-False-Claims-Act.pdf
According to Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, both former Merck virologists, the Merck company engaged in all the following behavior:
• Merck knowingly falsified its mumps vaccine test results to fabricate a “95% efficacy rate.”
• In order to do this, Merck spiked the blood test with animal antibodies in order to artificially inflate the appearance of immune system antibodies. As reported in CourthouseNews.com:
Merck also added animal antibodies to blood samples to achieve more favorable test results, though it knew that the human immune system would never produce such antibodies, and that the antibodies created a laboratory testing scenario that “did not in any way correspond to, correlate with, or represent real life … virus neutralization in vaccinated people,” according to the complaint. (http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/06/27/47851.htm)
• Merck then used the falsified trial results to swindle the U.S. government out of “hundreds of millions of dollars for a vaccine that does not provide adequate immunization.”
About time they were brought to task for their criminal acts against humanity