SaneVax, Inc.

The First International HPV Vaccine Information Clearinghouse

You are here: Home / NEWS . . . . . . . . / Vaccines / HPV / Cervarix / HPV Vaccine VAERS Reports March 2012

HPV Vaccine VAERS Reports March 2012

By 62 Comments

April 14, 2012

The following data was pulled from VAERS – the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System by Janny Stokvis.

The first slide shows an alarming percent increase in HPV Vaccine adverse injuries and deaths between March 2011 and March 2012.

The second and third slide show the number of adverse injuries and deaths and percent increases over the past 7 months.

 

 

Comments

  1. Diane Skorka says

    You need to STOP giving out this Gardasil vaccine..instead of preventing the HPV virus our children and grandchildren are dying. Do something to bring this rate down and I mean way down, please.

    Reply

    • Misti says

      I’d like to see those as numbers related to the total recipients of the drug. Also, there is no comparison to the rates of such events in the general populace. Before we start freaking out over statistics, we need context. Also, what they do not say in this article is that VAERS doesn’t follow up on any of these reports to determine a causal relationship between the vaccine and the “adverse reaction”. “A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine.” as stated on the website before you click the “I understand the preceeding statement” button to access the information.

      Reply

      • admin says

        Medical consumers around the globe would also like to see these numbers compared to the actual number of recipients. The problem is these numbers are always compared to distributed doses, not administered doses. You are absolutely right about the VAERS database – it is not a mandatory reporting system (should be), there is little to no follow-up (should be), and a report to VAERS does not prove causation. On the other hand, it does not rule out cause.
        No one is ‘freaking out’ over statistics – simply saying it is high time to investigate the events behind the statistics; do some independent scientifically conducted research and put the matter to rest. Surely you remember Vioxx?
        The concept is quite simple – if you pour gasoline all over yourself on a hot day, it will cool you down temporarily. You are still playing with fire.

        Reply

      • Aus says

        The entire thing is based on lies. According to GSK’s own site, this chart( http://twitpic.com/cejdat ) says only 0.15% of those who got infected with such ‘cancer-causing’ HPV get cervical cancer, and the rest WHOPPING 99.85% of those GET RID OF the ‘cancer-causing’ HPV without any treatment nor medication!! Your immune system gets rid of it. Most of the people, you see. Why do we need this vaccine to begin with? That figure also tells us that HPV is NOT THE CAUSE OF THIS CANCER. I have been investigating this for years now but not a single PROOF I’ve seen to claim that “HPV causes this cancer.” ALL LIES FOR $$$$$$$$$$$$. Absolutely unforgivable.

        Reply

        • anon says

          As a parent, I’m curious how you can support this claim. Are you a medical doctor trained to analyze symptoms and attempt to connect them with a medical cause for the reaction? The act of creating a life is supposed to supply all parents with this ability? Hmm…

          Reply

      • Jeff says

        Yeah no proof it was the vaccine, it must have been the apple juice, or the oreo cookies, just like when normal talking happy Johnny gets his 14 month injections and walks out fever riddled, head banging, screaming, not able to speak anymore, and permanently brain damaged, not the vaccine though huh? What caused it then? Oh wait all the scientists on planet earth have no explanation but rest assured not the immune system, brain damage listed on the insert injections.

        Reply

  2. Mindanoiha says

    In addition to the alarming increase in adverse events and deaths which have been reported to VAERS there are serious conditions which may occur longterm and which may not be attributed to the vaccine, for example cancer:

    DOES GARDASIL CAUSE CANCER?
    This is a undoubtedly a special question considering that Gardasil is promoted as a vaccine which is intended to ultimately prevent cancer. However, the question is both relevant and justifiable because a credible and satisfactory answer has not been presented.

    Sane Vax discovers potential bio-hazard in Gardasil:
    https://sanevax.org/sane-vax-inc-discovers-potential-bio-hazard-contaminant-in-merck%E2%80%99s-gardasil%E2%84%A2-hpv-4-vaccine/

    The presence of viral HPV recombinant DNA (rDNA) contamination which has been discovered in samples of the vaccine from New Zealand, Australia, Spain, Poland, France and three states in the U.S. is of deep concern.

    As Dr. Lee states: “Based on medical literature and some of the FDA/Merck’s own publications, adventitious (coming from an outside source) DNA in an injectable protein-based vaccine may increase the risk of autoimmune disorders and gene mutation which may lead to malignancies”.

    Further, quote from the above press release from Sane Vax:
    “High rates of autoimmune disorders, 380 reports of abnormal pap tests, 137 reports of cervical dysplasia, and 41 reports of cervical cancer including Carcinoma in situ or Cervix carcinoma or Cervix carcinoma stage 0 or Cervix carcinoma stage I or Cervix carcinoma stage III 6 warrants an immediate investigation into Gardasil’s™ safety and efficacy”.

    Information in the package insert states that the vaccine has not been tested for carcinogenicity. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
    In addition, there is the extremely relevant issue of “replacement”, a normal phenomenon in virology where strains which have been removed are always replaced by new ones. It is not known to anyone, even the manufacturer, whether the new virus strains are more carcinogenic than the original ones which have been removed.

    In other words it cannot possibly be guaranteed that Gardasil does not increase the risk of cancer before at least the following three issues have been seriously addressed:

    – Presence of recombinant DNA (rDNA)
    – Lack of carcinogenicity testing of the vaccine
    – Replacement

    It may be most inappropriate and have deeply tragic consequences if Gardasil, which is sometimes incorrectly termed a “cancer vaccine” is shown to actually increase the risk of cancer.

    Reply

  3. Mindanoiha says

    In addition to the increase in adverse events and deaths reported to VAERS there are serious conditions which may occur longterm, for example cancer:

    DOES GARDASIL CAUSE CANCER?
    This is a undoubtedly a special question considering that Gardasil is promoted as a vaccine which is intended to ultimately prevent cancer. However, the question is both relevant and justifiable because a credible and satisfactory answer has not been presented.

    Sane Vax discovers potential bio-hazard in Gardasil:
    https://sanevax.org/sane-vax-inc-discovers-potential-bio-hazard-contaminant-in-merck%E2%80%99s-gardasil%E2%84%A2-hpv-4-vaccine/

    The presence of viral HPV recombinant DNA (rDNA) contamination which has been discovered in samples of the vaccine from New Zealand, Australia, Spain, Poland, France and three states in the U.S. is of deep concern.

    As Dr. Lee states: “Based on medical literature and some of the FDA/Merck’s own publications, adventitious (coming from an outside source) DNA in an injectable protein-based vaccine may increase the risk of autoimmune disorders and gene mutation which may lead to malignancies”.

    Further, quote from the above press release from Sane Vax:
    “High rates of autoimmune disorders, 380 reports of abnormal pap tests, 137 reports of cervical dysplasia, and 41 reports of cervical cancer including Carcinoma in situ or Cervix carcinoma or Cervix carcinoma stage 0 or Cervix carcinoma stage I or Cervix carcinoma stage III 6 warrants an immediate investigation into Gardasil’s™ safety and efficacy”.

    Information in the package insert states that the vaccine has not been tested for carcinogenicity. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
    In addition, there is the extremely relevant issue of “replacement”, a normal phenomenon in virology where strains which have been removed are always replaced by new ones. It is not known to anyone, even the manufacturer, whether the new virus strains are more carcinogenic than the original ones which have been removed.

    In other words it cannot possibly be guaranteed that Gardasil does not increase the risk of cancer before at least the following three issues have been seriously addressed:

    – Presence of recombinant DNA (rDNA)
    – Lack of carcinogenicity testing of the vaccine
    – Replacement

    It may be most inappropriate and have deeply tragic consequences if Gardasil, which is sometimes incorrectly termed a “cancer vaccine” is shown to actually increase the risk of cancer.

    Reply

  4. Donna Eliassen says

    I agree. This vaccine almost killed my daughter. The rash it caused scarred her face too – I’d like to know who is going to foot the bill to fix that? And while they’re at it – how do you compensate a state champion for having to give up her swimming career and dreams to one day swim for Australia? Merck – you’re nothing but a bunch of murderous scum. When you look into your disastrous drug track record I am surprised you are still in business. INdividuals get the death penalty for what you get away with.

    Reply

    • Lorraine says

      Donna, that is so sad. And it must be infuriating and so unfair that we, as a country, honour the vaccine’s inventor, Professor Ian Frazer. First he gets Australian of the Year in 2006 and now he has been made a Companion in the Queen’s Birthday Honours

      Reply

  5. Mindanoiha says

    In addition to the cases which are reported to VAERS there are longterm adverse events which may occur, such as cancer. Because of the long time aspect it is not certain that it will be realised (or admitted) that cancer cases may be due to the vaccine.

    CAN GARDASIL CAUSE CANCER?

    This is undoubtedly a special question considering that Gardasil is promoted as a vaccine which is intended to ultimately prevent cancer. However, the question is both relevant and justifiable because a credible and satisfactory answer has not been presented.

    SANE Vax Inc. contracted with an independent lab to test for contamination and found aluminium adjuvant bound HPV recombinant DNA (rDNA) in 13 vaccine vials. The Gardasil vials with different lot numbers were from New Zealand, Australia, Spain, Poland, France and three states in the U.S. 100% of the samples tested positive for the presence of the genetically modified HPV DNA.

    Dr. Sin Hang Lee, a pathologist at the Milford Hospital pathology laboratory well-known for using cutting-edge DNA sequencing for molecular diagnoses, was initially contracted to examine a single sample of Gardasil for possible contamination. This sample tested positive for recombinant HPV-11 and HPV-18 residues, both of which were firmly attached to the aluminum adjuvant.

    ALUMINIUM BOUND RECOMBINANT DNA MAY CAUSE CANCER
    Dr Lee stated: “Based on medical literature and some of the FDA/Merck’s own publications, adventitious DNA in an injectable protein-based vaccine may increase the risk of autoimmune disorders and gene mutation which may lead to malignancies”.

    GARDASIL HAS NOT BEEN TESTED FOR CARCINOGENICITY
    Information in the package insert states that the vaccine has not been tested for carcinogenicity. (Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!)

    REPLACEMENT MAY CAUSE DEVELOPMENT OF CANCER
    In addition, there is the extremely relevant issue of replacement, where strains which have been removed are always replaced by new ones. It is not known to anyone, including the manufacturer, whether the new virus strains are more carcinogenic than the original ones which have been removed.

    In other words it cannot possibly be guaranteed that Gardasil does not increase the risk of cancer before at least the following three issues have been seriously addressed:

    – Presence of recombinant DNA (rDNA)
    – Lack of carcinogenicity testing of the vaccine
    – Replacement

    It may be most inappropriate and have deeply tragic consequences if Gardasil, which is sometimes incorrectly termed a “cancer vaccine” is shown to actually increase the risk of cancer.

    Posting as Sandy L (Change)
    •

    Reply

  6. Robert Walton says

    These numbers only show the 10% reported so we have to do more multiplication of these criminally damaged young ladies. Actualy its likely closer to 1% reported.

    Some hemp juicing and some building of glutathione levels needed big time for all of them to lesson the damage from this vaccine.

    Google Immunocal parents!

    Reply

    • Annie says

      We live in the Uk and my 12 year old daughter had her first HPV vaccine in December 2011 and with in a day she had tummy pain and felt sick.
      We just thought it was a bug but it did not go away and in January she had the second HPV vaccine and every day after that she has been really unwell. She is always tired and weak,struggles to get to sleep and when she does she struggles to get up. She has stomach pain Dailey and takes a lot of calpol ,her muscles and joints ache,she gets headaches,shakes and tingling in arms and legs.
      She has leaking bladder and when she is a sleep you can see her legs twitching. She gets dizzy and a lot of the time she feels short of breath and complains of chest pains.
      By February she she got deeply depressed because she is not getting any better and doctors can not find anything wrong with her and believe its in her head because she was diagnosed as having Aspergers syndrome when she was age 6.
      She is missing a lot of school and never wants to leave the house anymore or see friends. It’s breaking our hearts and it’s put a lot of strain on all of us as a family. Our youngest two sons feel effected by it and the 3 year old often crys with our daughter when she begs us not to take her to school in the morning. Me and dad are down because we feel lost and want nothing more than to help our daughter get well.
      The only help the doctors want to give now is therapy to our daughter for depression but her physical symptoms are real .
      Doctors have just dismissed our claim that the HPV vaccine has done this to our daughter.

      Reply

      • Lexi says

        Annie, As it most probably is a vaccine injury, it also sounds like a condition my husband has (Chiari Malformation) which can only be diagnosed with a brainstem MRI. Either way I hope she feels better soon!

        Reply

      • Tim Kelly says

        Annie I am sorry to hear of your daughters problems with Gardasil. If I was in your position I would look at a course of MMS (Miracle Mineral solution by Jim Humble) Look for Jim’s website. If you search about it, there are many trying to stop it’s efficacy by calling it bleach, but it is used to kill pathogens in water when travelling originally. Jim gave a little to a couple of his staff when he was propecting for gold, they had mild malaria. They recovered in 24 hrs. Jim went on experimenting and found he could cure Malaria and cured 80,000 in Africa before the medical authorities stopped him for it not being a registered medicine. He has since been working out the best way to use it in many diseases, Cancer one of them…recently a friend of mine in Bulgaria who works in a clinic saw a woman cure breast cancer in a few weeks. It kills all pathogens in the body and leaves healthy cells alone. It is available on the internet not too expensive. Whatever the vaccine has lodged in your daughter should be removed by it within weeks. I have personally taken it and cured heavy flu in 18 hrs. Diarhoea is the only side effect I had as it cleared toxins. If it was me and my daughter, I would give only small doses, 2 drops every 2-4 hours. First I would just give 2 drops and wait a day to see if any strong reaction presents. If none, then I would do 3 days of 2 drops every 2 hours, leaving a 2 hour break after food and eating 2hrs after any dose. This period should be enough to see if any benefit is coming…a rest day after 3 days or until she felt she could start again. It will be fairly fast detox and any sign of feeling stomach sickness over normal should be heeded and a break taken until she feels she can try again. Don’t force anything… I am just suggesting how I would approach it, but you will find lots of information and testimony if you look at the website. http://jimhumble.org/ I wish your daughter well and I will say a prayer for her. Tim §

        Reply

  7. Don says

    pretty basis population control. kill a bunch of women and less reproduction.

    the producers of these poisons need a taste of their own medicines.

    meanwhile the fda sits idlely like many other sorry federal agencies that are told what to do.

    look at the the increase of cancer and other diseases and look at the food you’re eating and vaccinations you’re given. it’s all poisoned from vaccinations to food to water. why you think they hate organic foods. they can’t poison you to death. no money in healthy people.

    Reply

  8. John Fryer says

    The data does show one important reduction when people use GARDASIL from MERCK.

    There is a clear OVERALL reduction in the number of people who remain in GOOD HEALTH.

    France has never resolved properly the problem of whether MS (Multiple Sclerosis) is caused by vaccines.

    It does not even get on the horizon of problems from Gardasil as there seem too many others competing for ACCEPTANCE.

    Perhaps the time from vaccine to MS if connected is too long to measure?

    The sudden death 6 hours after a vaccine for Harry Clark was in 1997 to distantly related to be connected as the mother got the blame for the death of her previously healthy boy.

    It seems in medical matters and vaccines health is not an issue for the Big Pharma to consider except to admit the vaccines are not working and if they do work their effect wears away in a short space of time.

    Lets cling to the fact that some dont have problems after their vaccines and it helps people keep jobs and make a dime or two.

    And as Mr Bill Gates tells us vaccines are the best way he knows to keep the population growth down.

    So the take home note is give this to someone else but don’t take it yourself unless you wish to support the government, industry et al with their “HEALTH” agenda.

    Reply

  10. bee says

    Annie, the lady with the 12 year old daughter……I AM BEGGING YOU NOT TO GIVE YOUR DAUGHTER ANY FURTHER GARDASIL VACCINES. SHE IS SHOWING ADVERSE REACTIONS TO THE VACCINE ALREADY. I know what I am talking about I have strong medical background and wish I’d never allowed my child to get this vaccine. I was a firm believer of vaccines before my child became severely ill. I have a 12 year old daughter who was partially paralyzed by Gardasil vaccines. Please listen to me – there are some people who are able to tolerate this vaccine and some do not. Patients need to be thoroughly screened before getting this vaccine. Don’t jeapardized your child’s life by completing the series of gardasil vaccines. My child got ill within a couple weeks but I didn’t link her illness to this vaccine until a month or so later. She was healthy and active had no medical illnesses or problems, then she started experiencing all sorts or problems, pain and cramping tingling shooting pains in legs back stomach, twitching all over, swallowing difficulty, muscles started wasting away in legs, pin pricking sensations, feet and legs became distorted looking/twisting, central and peripheral nervous system damage, falling in floor, couldn’t stand up/walk, paleness and fainting, heart racing/palpitations, hands arms tingling, headaches etc…It’s been almost 4 years now and my daughter is better but may never be able to run, jump or move very fast at all. She is alive and I am blessed.. Please listen; I hope my words will keep at least one child from the pain and torment that my child and our family have went through.

    Reply

  11. bee says

    Annie, the lady with the 12 year old daughter……I AM BEGGING YOU NOT TO GIVE YOUR DAUGHTER ANY FURTHER GARDASIL VACCINES. SHE IS SHOWING ADVERSE REACTIONS TO THE VACCINE ALREADY. I know what I am talking about I have strong medical background and wish I’d never allowed my child to get this vaccine. I was a firm believer of vaccines before my child became severely ill. I have a 12 year old daughter who was partially paralyzed by Gardasil vaccines. Please listen to me – there are some people who are able to tolerate this vaccine and some do not. Patients need to be thoroughly screened before getting this vaccine. Don’t jeapardized your child’s life by completing the series of gardasil vaccines. My child got ill within a couple weeks but I didn’t link her illness to this vaccine until a month or so later. She was healthy and active had no medical illnesses or problems, then she started experiencing all sorts or problems, pain and cramping tingling shooting pains in legs back stomach, twitching all over, swallowing difficulty, muscles started wasting away in legs, pin pricking sensations, feet and legs became distorted looking/twisting, central and peripheral nervous system damage, falling in floor, couldn’t stand up/walk, paleness and fainting, heart racing/palpitations, hands arms tingling, headaches etc…It’s been almost 4 years now and my daughter is better but may never be able to run, jump or move very fast at all. She is alive and I am blessed.. Please listen; I hope my words will keep at least one child from the pain and torment that my child went through.

    Reply

  12. Godfrey says

    .INEFFICACY OF THE HPV VACCINE SEEN BY DOCTOR OF DEEP PERÚ

    From its inception until the appearance of cervical carcinoma (UCC), takes on average 25 to 30 years, the research of this vaccine have begun in 2000, it is evident that the scientific efficacy of this new vaccine will be determined the years 2025 – 2030.
    HPV not causes definitely the (CCU); at the onset of this disease involves multiple risk factors, including the suspected HPV, but scientificaly is proven by epidemiology and statistics that the sex is what generates this disease .: Mix in 130.000 nuns found not any UCC.
    http://www.portalesmedicos.com/publicaciones/articles/1832/1/Epidemiologia-del-carcinoma-del-cuello-uterino.html
    To accept that a virus or a bacteria causes a infection disease must unfailingly fulfill the five Koch’s postulate
    http://www.xatakaciencia.com/salud/los-postulados-de-koch
    1 – The agent must be present in every case of the disease and absent from healthy.
    2 – The agent must not appear in other diseases.
    3 – The agent to be isolated in pure culture from disease lesions.
    4 – The agent of causing disease in a susceptible animal being inoculated.
    5 – The agent must again be isolated lesions in experimental animals.
    http://es.scribd.com/doc/44558220/MICROBIOLOGIA-1
    Consequently, HPV not fulfill not any principle of Koch’s postulate. by not meeting this postulate, that is accepted as dogma in medicine, scientifically we must be ensure that the HPV is not the causative agent to the UCC..
    Until August 2012 this vaccine produced only in the United States: 265.640 adverse events ( 264,162 females, 9490 males and 5290 unknow sex); permnent disability 8910( 8890 females, 90 males and 110 unknow sex), 1220 deaths (1011 females, 70 males and 140 unknow sex), abnormal PAP 4930, cervical dysplasia 1970 and cervical cancer 570
    http://holyhormones.com/vaccinations/hpv-vaccine/hpv-vaccine-adverse-events-reported-to-vaers-as-of-july-13-2012/
    http://therefusers.com/?s=cervarix
    The Vaccine efects advers reactions (VAERS) ensures that only complaint between 1% to 10% of the adverse effects produced by this evil vaccine;this figures shown are calculated according to the statements of the VAERS: to 10%.
    http://www.noticiero.enkoria.com/2011/diez-menores-que-sufrieron-reaccion-adversa-a-la-vacuna-vph-d
    http://www.pop.org/content/merck-researcher-admits-gardasil-guards-against-almost-nothing-985
    Dr. Harper, who contributed to the development of the vaccine by Merck, reports that the vaccine was not investigated in children under 15 years and the vaccine given to children under 11 years is a big public experiment.
    http://offtheradar.co.nz/vaccines/53-researcher-diane-harper-blasts-gardasil-hpv-marketing.html
    The vaccine was approved to give girls uncontaminated with HPV, Dr. Howenstinc ensures that the women are vaccinated with HPV contaminated, have the possibility to acquire a 44.6% CCU
    http://www.newswithviews.com / Howenstine/james170.htm.
    Merck did not disclose that the vaccine was transgenic, the Sane Vax has discovered, which is transgenic because it has been found that the vaccine is contaminated with DNA recombinant vaccine Gardasil (DNArPVH) and has raised its concerns to the president of the FDA Margaret Hamburg. The FDA replied that the vaccine will not cause any damage transgenic
    http://real-agenda.com/2011/09/16/vacuna-gardasil-contaminada-con-adn-recombinante-de-vph/
    http://bolsonweb.com.ar/diariobolson/detalle.php?id_noticia=26075
    A vaccinated child was ill with rheumatoid arthritis, which is an autoimmune disease. 24 hours after vaccination and found that the aluminum adhered to DNArPVH, two years after vaccination and in autopsy 6 months after death in a New Zeland girl Jazmine Renata which had recibed this deadly vaccines
    http://www.mecfsforums.com/index.php?topic=9331.0
    Management time to get market approval of a drug the FDA is at least three years, it is a drug for cancer 15 years, but the authorization Merck had only six months and the European Medicines Agency (EMA in English) only 9 months: To introduce the vaccine are using the marketing of fear
    http://mujeresenaccion.over-blog.es/article-vph-la-vacuna-del-marketing-del-miedo-67210961.ht http://mujeresenaccion.over-blog.es/article-vph-la-vacuna -of-marketing-of-fear-67210961.ht
    HPV is ubiquitous; lives in wild and domestic animals, pollute us from birth, is on the doorknobs, on towels, on nails, on fomites, in gloves and specula of gynecologists,. sexual intercourse is not the only means of contamination.
    http://spa.myhealthygood.com/cancer-cervical-vacuna-contra-el-vph/investigadores-descubren-el-v
    HPV also lives in the 400 nm outermost of our skin and mucous membranes. ,
    If you live in our skin, our immune system produces cellular and humoral immunity is acquired or that our body is self vaccinatinge by PVHs living on our skin and mucous ..
    http://www.conganat.org/seap/bibliografia/HPVToday/HPVToday007SEAP.pdf
    The PVHs is not distributed uniformly worldwide. It has been found that in Canada HPV 18 only reaches 3%; is more often HPV 31, in my country Peru no studies have determined that HPV types predominate; Gardasil contains 225 mcg. aluminum and Cervarix 500 mcg, that produce the Alzheimer, Parkinson and autism, produce too neurotoxic and immune system disorders (Blaylock 2012) and Polisorbato 80, a powerful contraceptive, that in experimental animals produces sterility, atrophy of the testicles and disturbance organic and funtional of the organs of the reproduction; is carcinogenic and mutagenic; also contains sodium borate considered poison unused in medicinal preparations (NLM)
    http://www.telefonica.net/web2/paramahamsa/vacunaninosalerta.html http://detenganlavacuna.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/gardasil-cervarix/
    Have been discovered to date 200 types of HPV; HPV is not infectious, contagious; the intercourse is not only that the persons is contaminated
    http://www.asbmb.org/Webforms.aspx?ekfrm=46
    http://quimicaclinicauv.blogspot.com/2006/08/virus-del-papiloma-humano.html http://www-lab.biomedicas.unam.mx/smpv/queeshpv.htm
    On 22-11-2010 FDA approved Gardasil for males aged 9 to 26 to prevent warts and cancer to the anus, is overkill
    http://real-agenda.com/2011/09/16/vacuna-gardasil-contaminada-con-adn-recombinante-de-vph/
    http://salud.aollatino.com/2011/02/02/aprueba-fda-nueva-indicacion-vacuna-tetravalente-vph-eeuu/
    For this reasons from deep Peru Huancayo, I believe that this vaccine is a fraud?, robbery?, swindle?, rough joke?.
    The HPV is not scientifically proved for the moment that produce the UCC its effectiveness shall be verified just the years of 2025-2030.
    Dr. Godofredo Arauzo
    E mail: godo.ara@ gmail.com

    Reply

  13. Godofredo says

    INEFFICACY OF THE HPV VACCINE SEEN BY DOCTOR OF DEEP PERÚ
    From its inception until the appearance of cervical carcinoma (UCC), takes on average 25 to 40 years, the research of this vaccine have begun in 2000, it is evident that the scientific efficacy of this new vaccine will be determined the years 2025 – 2040.
    HPV not causes definitely the (CCU); at the onset of this disease involves multiple risk factors, including the suspected HPV, but scientificaly is proven by epidemiology and statistics that the sex is what generates this disease .: Mix in 130.000 nuns found not any UCC.
    http://www.portalesmedicos.com/publicaciones/articles/1832/1/Epidemiolog…
    To accept that a virus or a bacteria causes a infection disease must unfailingly fulfill the five Koch’s postulate
    http://www.xatakaciencia.com/salud/los-postulados-de-koch
    1 – The agent must be present in every case of the disease and absent from healthy.
    2 – The agent must not appear in other diseases.
    3 – The agent to be isolated in pure culture from disease lesions.
    4 – The agent of causing disease in a susceptible animal being inoculated.
    5 – The agent must again be isolated lesions in experimental animals.
    http://es.scribd.com/doc/44558220/MICROBIOLOGIA-1
    Consequently, HPV not fulfill not any principle of Koch’s postulate. by not meeting this postulate, that is accepted as dogma in medicine, scientifically we must be ensure that the HPV is not the causative agent to the UCC..
    Until August 2012 this vaccine produced only in the United States: 265.640 adverse events ( 264,162 females, 9490 males and 5290 unknow sex); permnent disability 8910( 8890 females, 90 males and 110 unknow sex), 1220 deaths (1011 females, 70 males and 140 unknow sex), abnormal PAP 4930, cervical dysplasia 1970 and cervical cancer 570
    http://holyhormones.com/vaccinations/hpv-vaccine/hpv-vaccine-adverse-eve…
    http://therefusers.com/?s=cervarix
    The Vaccine efects advers reactions (VAERS) ensures that only complaint between 1% to 10% of the adverse effects produced by this evil vaccine;this figures shown are calculated according to the statements of the VAERS: to 10%.
    http://www.noticiero.enkoria.com/2011/diez-menores-que-sufrieron-reaccio…
    http://www.pop.org/content/merck-researcher-admits-gardasil-guards-again…
    Dr. Harper, who contributed to the development of the vaccine by Merck, reports that the vaccine was not investigated in children under 15 years and the vaccine given to children under 11 years is a big public experiment.
    http://offtheradar.co.nz/vaccines/53-researcher-diane-harper-blasts-gard…
    The vaccine was approved to give girls uncontaminated with HPV, Dr. Howenstinc ensures that the women are vaccinated with HPV contaminated, have the possibility to acquire a 44.6% CCU
    http://www.newswithviews.com / Howenstine/james170.htm.
    Merck did not disclose that the vaccine was transgenic, the Sane Vax has discovered, which is transgenic because it has been found that the vaccine is contaminated with DNA recombinant vaccine Gardasil (DNArPVH) and has raised its concerns to the president of the FDA Margaret Hamburg. The FDA replied that the vaccine will not cause any damage transgenic
    http://real-agenda.com/2011/09/16/vacuna-gardasil-contaminada-con-adn-re…
    http://bolsonweb.com.ar/diariobolson/detalle.php?id_noticia=26075
    A vaccinated child was ill with rheumatoid arthritis, which is an autoimmune disease. 24 hours after vaccination and found that the aluminum adhered to DNArPVH, two years after vaccination and in autopsy 6 months after death in a New Zeland girl Jazmine Renata which had recibed this deadly vaccines
    http://www.mecfsforums.com/index.php?topic=9331.0
    Management time to get market approval of a drug the FDA is at least three years, it is a drug for cancer 15 years, but the authorization Merck had only six months and the European Medicines Agency (EMA in English) only 9 months: To introduce the vaccine are using the marketing of fear
    http://mujeresenaccion.over-blog.es/article-vph-la-vacuna-del-marketing-… http://mujeresenaccion.over-blog.es/article-vph-la-vacuna -of-marketing-of-fear-67210961.ht
    HPV is ubiquitous; lives in wild and domestic animals, pollute us from birth, is on the doorknobs, on towels, on nails, on fomites, in gloves and specula of gynecologists,. sexual intercourse is not the only means of contamination.
    http://spa.myhealthygood.com/cancer-cervical-vacuna-contra-el-vph/invest…
    HPV also lives in the 400 nm outermost of our skin and mucous membranes. ,
    If you live in our skin, our immune system produces cellular and humoral immunity is acquired or that our body is self vaccinatinge by PVHs living on our skin and mucous ..
    http://www.conganat.org/seap/bibliografia/HPVToday/HPVToday007SEAP.pdf
    The PVHs is not distributed uniformly worldwide. It has been found that in Canada HPV 18 only reaches 3%; is more often HPV 31, in my country Peru no studies have determined that HPV types predominate; Gardasil contains 225 mcg. aluminum and Cervarix 500 mcg, that produce the Alzheimer, Parkinson and autism, produce too neurotoxic and immune system disorders (Blaylock 2012) and Polisorbato 80, a powerful contraceptive, that in experimental animals produces sterility, atrophy of the testicles and disturbance organic and funtional of the organs of the reproduction; is carcinogenic and mutagenic; also contains sodium borate considered poison unused in medicinal preparations (NLM)
    http://www.telefonica.net/web2/paramahamsa/vacunaninosalerta.html http://detenganlavacuna.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/gardasil-cervarix/
    Have been discovered to date 200 types of HPV; HPV is not infectious, contagious; the intercourse is not only that the persons is contaminated
    http://quimicaclinicauv.blogspot.com/2006/08/virus-del-papiloma-humano.html http://www-lab.biomedicas.unam.mx/smpv/queeshpv.htm
    On 22-11-2010 FDA approved Gardasil for males aged 9 to 26 to prevent warts and cancer to the anus, is overkill
    http://real-agenda.com/2011/09/16/vacuna-gardasil-contaminada-con-adn-re…
    http://salud.aollatino.com/2011/02/02/aprueba-fda-nueva-indicacion-vacun…
    For the reasons from deep Peru Huancayo, I believe that this vaccine is a fraud?, a robbery?, a swindle?, a rough joke?, a crime?, a shame?
    The HPV is not scientifically proved for the moment that produce the UCC its effectiveness shall be verified just the years of 2025-2040.
    Dr. Godofredo Arauzo
    E mail: godo.ara@ gmail.com

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. The Robert Scott Bell Show a Michael Badnarik, Secret Service Scandal, April 15 Tax Slavery, Rights vs. Privileges, Christopher Barr, Antoine Bechamp Homage, Law of the Terrain, Lung Health, Chemical Diabetes, Gardasil AER, Gut Prevention of Cancer, Ron P says:

    […] The latest horrific numbers on adverse events from Gardasil and Cervarix… https://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccine-vaers-reports-march-2012/ […]

    Reply

  4. […] Previously healthy, young women are reporting cervical abnormalities and cancer after receiving the HPV vaccine. In March 2012, 669 women reported abnormal pap smears and cervical dysplasia to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. 50 women reported cancer as a result of the HPV vaccine. It is estimated that these reports are a very small percentage of the actual events. (https://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccine-vaers-reports-march-2012/) […]

    Reply
  5. Forbidden News » HPV and Hepatitis B vaccines do not prevent cervical cancer and liver disease says:

    […] Previously healthy, young women are reporting cervical abnormalities and cancer after receiving the HPV vaccine. In March 2012, 669 women reported abnormal pap smears and cervical dysplasia to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. 50 women reported cancer as a result of the HPV vaccine. It is estimated that these reports are a very small percentage of the actual events. (https://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccine-vaers-reports-march-2012/) […]

    Reply
  7. HPV and Hepatitis B vaccines do not prevent cervical cancer and liver disease | Natural Health Cures | Remedies that Cure says:

    […] Previously healthy, young women are reporting cervical abnormalities and cancer after receiving the HPV vaccine. In March 2012, 669 women reported abnormal pap smears and cervical dysplasia to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. 50 women reported cancer as a result of the HPV vaccine. It is estimated that these reports are a very small percentage of the actual events. (https://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccine-vaers-reports-march-2012/) […]

    Reply

  11. […] Previously healthy, young women are reporting cervical abnormalities and cancer after receiving the HPV vaccine. In March 2012, 669 women reported abnormal pap smears and cervical dysplasia to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. 50 women reported cancer as a result of the HPV vaccine. It is estimated that these reports are a very small percentage of the actual events. (https://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccine-vaers-reports-march-2012/) […]

    Reply
  12. HPV and Hepatitis B vaccines do not prevent cervical cancer and liver disease | Health News Site says:

    […] Previously healthy, young women are reporting cervical abnormalities and cancer after receiving the HPV vaccine. In March 2012, 669 women reported abnormal pap smears and cervical dysplasia to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. 50 women reported cancer as a result of the HPV vaccine. It is estimated that these reports are a very small percentage of the actual events. (https://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccine-vaers-reports-march-2012/) […]

    Reply
  21. Вакцините: ефикасност и безбедност – 50 години подоцна | Здравје на игла НЕ влегува says:

    […] Така се брендираше и вирусот ХПВ и ракот на грло на матка, кој одеднаш стана епидемија кога вакцината беше спремна но не и проверена на целата популација за која се препорачува. Иако вакцината штити само од 4 подтипа на вирусот, од вкупно 200, има генетски модифицирани вируси, двојно поголема доза на алуминиум од другите вакцини, Полисорбат 80 (кај женски заморчиња предизвикува стерилитет, кај машки атрофија на тестиси). Сега се повлекува од пазарите во светот,поради несаканите ефекти кои човечките заморчиња – тинејџерки, ги доживуваа. За само 7 години (2006-2013) во САД , пријавени се 30. 674 несакани реакции од кои 140 смртни случаи, 963 трајни инвалидитети, 6085 никогаш не се оправиле 534 позитивни ПАП резултати 216 дисплазии на грлото на матката и 65 случаи на рак на грлото на матката.(sanevax.org)  http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/05/10/the-hpv-vaccine-preventive-care-or-human-sacrifice.aspx,  https://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccine-vaers-reports-march-2012/ […]

    Reply

  22. […] Previously healthy, young women are reporting cervical abnormalities and cancer after receiving the HPV vaccine. In March 2012, 669 women reported abnormal pap smears and cervical dysplasia to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. 50 women reported cancer as a result of the HPV vaccine. It is estimated that these reports are a very small percentage of the actual events. (https://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccine-vaers-reports-march-2012/) […]

    Reply
  23. Отворено писмо до премиерот Груевски за најавената набавка на поливалентни вакцини во Македонија | says:

    […] Така се брендираше и вирусот ХПВ  и ракот на грло на матка, кој одеднаш стана епидемија кога вакцината беше спремна  но не и проверена за целната популација за која се препорачува. Иако вакцината штити само од 4 подтипа на вирусот, од вкупно 200, има генетски модифицирани вируси, двојно поголема доза на алуминиум од другите вакцини, Полисорбат 80 (кај женски заморчиња предизвикува стерилитет, кај машки атрофија на тестиси). Сега се повлекува од пазарите во светот,поради несаканите ефекти кои човечките заморчиња – тинејџерки, ги доживуваа. За само 7 години (2006-2013) во САД , пријавени се  30. 674 несакани реакции од кои 140 смртни случаи, 963 трајни инвалидитети, 6085 никогаш не се оправиле 534 позитивни ПАП резултати 216 дисплазии на грлото на матката и 65 случаи на рак на грлото на матката.(sanevax.org) http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/05/10/the-hpv-vaccine-preventive-care-or-human-sacrifice.aspx, https://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccine-vaers-reports-march-2012/ […]

    Reply

  26. […] HPV Vaccine VAERS Reports March 2012 […]

    Reply

  27. […] high incidence of serious reactions have been reported in the U.S ever since Gardasil was released there in 2006. Even the drug manufacturer’s own […]

    Reply

  28. […] high incidence of serious reactions have been reported in the U.S ever since Gardasil was released there in 2006. Even the drug manufacturer’s own clinical […]

    Reply

  30. […] high incidence of serious reactions have been reported in the U.S ever since Gardasil was released there in 2006. Even the drug manufacturer’s own clinical […]

    Reply
  31. Pig Pharma’s Ineffective & Toxic Vaccines Continue to Destroy the Health of Children! | An Outsider's Sojourn II says:

    […] high incidence of serious reactions have been reported in the U.S ever since Gardasil was released there in 2006. Even the drug manufacturer’s own clinical […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Videos

Contact