Deaths Reported
By Norma Erickson
Death reports after HPV vaccines have been filed at a rate of less than five per month since Gardasil and Cervarix were approved for use in the United States in 2006/07. The SaneVax team was shocked when the latest available update from the VAERS (vaccine adverse event reporting system) database revealed 34 death reports after HPV vaccines in a single month.
You can pretty much bet that any anomaly of this magnitude bears investigation. The SaneVax team decided to run a search for only the deaths reported after administration of HPV vaccines within the last month. 35 death reports show up (We assume one was prior to the close of the previous month’s stats). The other 34 are identical reports from “a nurse via a company sales representative.”
To run the same search, go to www.medalerts.org and choose the HPV vaccines (HPV2, HPV4 and HPVX), death and a lower appeared on VAERS date of Oct 2014 – to run the same search our team did. You might want to take a look and see what you think.
Several questions come immediately to mind, such as:
-
- Is Merck trying to muddy the VAERS water even more by stacking the death count?
If so, why did they not include all 72 reports referred to in the 35 that were submitted to VAERS?
Why are the reports submitted by a sales rep instead of the nurse who was referred to in all of the reports?
- Why does each report have a different submission date?
- The reports refer to a physician reporting at a vaccine conference “72 deaths after Gardasil administration via embolism/thrombosis events,” could this possibly be a legitimate report?
- Perhaps the FDA/CDC included all of these reports in a single month hoping someone like us would simply report the numbers and thereby be open to being discredited/ridiculed?
- Will the other 37 reports show up next month – or at a later date?
Whatever the answers to the questions above end up being, VAERS reports are what they are – despite the limitations of the system. SaneVax has built our reputation on reporting from only scientific, medical, or government documents so we will continue to report the statistics in VAERS as they are updated by health officials from the United States government.
The SaneVax team would strongly suggest viewing this particular increase in death reports after HPV vaccine administration with much caution. Feel free to raise questions of your own – investigate for yourself.
The updated VAERS reports for HPV vaccines through November 2014 can be viewed here.
Any questions? Ask the FDA or the CDC!
Or, better yet – ask your congressional representatives and senators why there are no penalties for failure to comply with the ‘mandatory’ reporting of suspected adverse events (possible side-effects) after vaccine administration as required under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act!
Thank you for drawing attention to this worrying situation. It is not only worrying, it is also very strange indeed.
The exact same wording is recorded for all SMQs and Write-up cases for many cases including:
ID 551768, 552237, 552238, 552239, 552240, 552244, 552245, 552248, 552296, 552308, 552315, 552317, 552321, 552482, 552483, 552484, 552485, 552486, 552513, 552517, 552518, 552519, 552520, 552521, 552122, 552531, 552532, 552533, 552537
Here is the exact same wording for all the above cases:
“SMQs:, Embolic and thrombotic events, vessel type unspecified and mixed arterial and venous (narrow), Thrombophlebitis (broad)
Write-up: Case 5 of 72. This spontaneous report as received from a nurse via a company sales representative refers to a female patient of unknown age. On an unknown date the patient was vaccinated with GARDASIL. No co-suspect or concomitant therapies reported. The nurse recently attended a conference on vaccinations in general. The physician who presented information on various vaccinations mentioned that there was 72 young girls who were vaccinated with GARDASIL and died due to thrombosis following vaccination (death). The cause of death was reported as thrombosis. The reporter considered death due to thrombosis following vaccination to be related to GARDASIL. Additional information was requested. 23-Oct-2014: The reporter has not further information regarding the patients. Additional information is not expected”.
This is a crazy thought and it would be an absolute scandal if it is actually the case, but one can’t help but ask if it’s maybe the result of a computer which has run completely wild.
Regarding my previous comment:
We have found these additional ID cases: 552539/40/41, 552619, 554152.
In addition to the possible reason that a VAERS computer may have a virus, many now have a most uncomfortable theory that people connected to the vaccine industry may be attempting to destroy VAERS’ credibility.
I don’t know if I did right…
I did try to do as you wrote, but there was no choice of OCT14 and what I got was:
Found 8 cases where Vaccine is HPV2 or HPV4 or HPVX and Patient Died and Date of Death on/after ‘2014-01-01’
Table
Age Count Percent
12-17 Years 5 62.5%
17-44 Years 1 12.5%
Unknown 2 25%
TOTAL 8 100%
(quote from
http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php )
Did you get its screen shot by any chance??
Here is a link to the completed search – there were technical problems when the article was written. We could not always get the link to work. I am hoping that is resolved now. http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=AGE&EVENTS=ON&VAX%5B%5D=HPV2&
amp;VAX[]=HPV4&VAX[]=HPVX&DIED=Yes&REPORT_YEAR_LOW=2014&REPORT_MONTH_LOW=10
Hi, I tried to do the search but was not able to follow the instructions very well as I have never tried it before. The closest I came to getting the said info inputted created a zero death toll for Nov 2014: http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php
Does anyone know how to input the data correctly or could someone post the link once they have found the info talked about in the article please?
Thank you
Here is a link to the completed research. It was not included in the article because there were some technical difficulties at the time. Perhaps the link will work now. http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=AGE&EVENTS=ON&VAX%5B%5D=HPV2&
amp;VAX[]=HPV4&VAX[]=HPVX&DIED=Yes&REPORT_YEAR_LOW=2014&REPORT_MONTH_LOW=10
So is this article questioning the validity of these new reports because a sales representative posted them??? There is something questionable about these? More investigating needed! Pardon my ignorance.
There are multiple questions raised by these particular reports. Why did the nurse not file reports? Why did the doctor from the seminar not file the reports? Why was it left to a sales rep to do the filing? Have the parents also filed reports? More investigation is absolutely necessary – 72 reported deaths should most assuredly be thoroughly investigated – for reasons too numerous to mention.
Now while some of these people might have died down the line from cervical cancer (can’t say this for sure however) I would venture to guess NONE of them would have died as young teens from cervical cancer. So really we are risking death now at a young age to POSSIBLY prevent cancer in 30 years which if regular paps are done probably can be avoided or minimized. And in fact we do not really know if there won’t be a more virulent strain or strains come up as a result of vaccination in the long run.
This link works for me… http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?EVENTS=on&PAGENO=19&PERPAGE=10&ESORT=NONE&REVERSESORT=&VAX=%28HPV2+HPV4+HPVX%29&SYMPTOMS=%28Death_%2810011906%29%29
INEFICACIA DE LA VACUNA CONTRA EL PVH VISTO POR
MÉDICO DEL PERÚ PROFUNDO
Dr. Godofredo Arauzo.-
La eficacia científica de esta vacuna recién se determinará los años 2025-2030 porque las investigaciones se han iniciado la década del 2000. Desde su inicio hasta la aparición del Carcinoma del cuello uterino (CCU), demora en promedio 25 a 30 años.
El PVH definitivamente no origina el (CCU); en la aparición de esta patología intervienen múltiples factores de riesgo, entre ellos se sospecha que puede ser el PVH; sí está comprobado que el acto sexual es el que genera esta enfermedad:
Nix en 1000 monjas no halló ningún CCU. http://www.portalesmedicos.com/publicaciones/articles/1832/1/Epidemiologia-del-carcinoma-del-cuello-uterino.html
Para aceptar que un virus a bacteria es el que origina una enfermedad tiene que cumplir indefectiblemente los 5 principios del Postulado de Koch: . http://www.xatakaciencia.com/salud/los-postulados-de-koch
1- El agente debe estar presente en cada caso de la enfermedad y ausente en los sanos.
2- El agente no debe aparecer en otras enfermedades.
3- El agente ha de ser aislado en un cultivo puro a partir de las lesiones de la enfermedad.
4- El agente ha de provocar la enfermedad en un animal susceptible de ser inoculado.
5- El agente ha de ser aislado de nuevo en las lesiones de los animales en experimentación.
1. Principio: no se ha encontrado el PVH físico en ningún carcinoma del cuello uterino (CCU), se ha encontrado su ADN por inmunología, que puede interpretarse como que el virus está presente o que es un residuo inmunológico. y su detección por inmunología no se ha conseguido en todos los CCU sino hasta el 90% de CCU: No cumple este primer principio;
2. Principio: El agente aparece también en las verrugas no aparece solamente en los CCU: Tampoco cumple este principio;
3. Principio: No se ha aislado cultivando a partir de un CCU: No cumple este principio
4. Principio: Al inocular el PVH a un animal de laboratorio, produce la enfermedad. Cómo no se ha aislado del CCU, no se ha inoculado a un animal de laboratorio. Incumple este principio y
5. Como no se inoculó porque no se halló en un CCU, no reproduce el CCU. Incumplió también este principio.
En consecuencia, el PVH no cumple ningún principio del postulado de Koch. al no cumplir este postulado que es aceptado como dogma en el mundo, científicamente se puede asegurar que no es el agente causante del CCU.
Hasta Marzo de este año han muerto 95 niñas; hasta el 2009 se habían producido 20,000 reacciones adversas y más de mil daños invalidantes irreversibles.
La VAERS informa: que han producido 376 Papanicolaou anormales; 108 verrugas anogenitales, 224 infecciones con el PVH, 41 cánceres del cuello uterino, 21,634 efectos adversos y 95 muertes, después de la vacunación.
La VAERS asegura que se dan a conocer solamente del 1 al 10% de los efectos adversos y muertes por esta aciaga vacuna, en consecuencia se han producido 216,340 efectos adversos y 950 muertes solamente en USA y a todas los daños enumerados agregarles un cero.
http://www.noticiero.enkoria.com/2011/diez-menores-que-sufrieron-reaccion-adversa-a-la-vacuna-vph-dhttp://www.noticiero.enkoria.com/2011/diez-menores-que-sufrieron-reaccion-adversa-a-la-vacuna-vph-dhttp://www.noticiero.enkoria.com/2011/diez-menores-que-sufrieron-reaccion-adversa-a-la-vacuna-vph-d
La Dra. Harper, la que contribuyó a la elaboración de la vacuna por Merck, refiere que la vacuna no fue investigada en menores de 15 años y la vacuna dada a menores de 11 años es un gran experimento público. http://offtheradar.co.nz/vaccines/53-researcher-diane-harper-blasts-gardasil-hpv-marketing.html
La vacuna fue aprobada para dar a niñas no contaminadas con el PVH; el Dr.Howenstinc publica que si se vacuna a mujeres contaminadas con el PVH, tienen la posibilidad de adquirir el CCU en un 44.6% http://www.newswithviews.com/Howenstine/james170.htm.
La Sane vax ha descubierta la contaminación de la vacuna gardasil con el DNA del PVH y ha elevado su preocupación a la presidenta de la FDA Margaret Hamburg http://www.mecfsforums.com/index.php?topic=9331.0
Para introducir la vacuna están utilizando el marketing del miedo: http://mujeresenaccion.over-blog.es/article-vph-la-vacuna-del-marketing-del-miedo-67210961.hthttp://mujeresenaccion.over-blog.es/article-vph-la-vacuna-del-marketing-del-miedo-67210961.ht
El PVH vive en los animales domésticos y silvestres; nos contaminamos desde que nacemos; se halla en las perillas de las puertas, en las toallas, en las uñas, en los fomites, en los guantes y espéculos de los ginecólogos. Se duda que el acto sexual sea el único medio de contaminación http://spa.myhealthygood.com/cancer-cervical-vacuna-contra-el-vph/investigadores-descubren-el-v
EL PVH VIVE TAMBIÉN EN LOS 400 NANÓMETROS MÁS EXTERNOS DE NUESTRA PIEL,
Sí vive en nuestra piel, nuestro sistema inmunológico produce inmunidad celular y humoral adquirida o sea que nuestro organismo está siendo vacunado EN FORMA NATURAL por los PVH que viven en nuestra piel y por inferencia podemos asegurar que también viven en las mucosas..
http://www.conganat.org/seap/bibliografia/HPVToday/HPVToday007SEAP.pdf Esta vacuna es transgénica; las vacunas que se conocen, son de virus originales, SE DESCONOCE los daños que producirá y está preparada para prevenir la infección por los PVHs 16 y 18 http://www.larevistaintegral.com/4874/vacuna-papilomavirus-%C2%BFes-peligrosa.html/comment-page-1#comment-11649.
Los PVHs no se distribuyen en el mundo de manera uniforme. Se ha comprobado que en el Canadá el PVH 18 sólo llega al 3%; es más frecuente el PVH 31; en mi patria Perú no hay estudios que hayan determinado que tipos de PVH predomina; Esta vacuna contiene 225 mcg. de aluminio, sospechoso de producir el Alzheimer y el Polisorbatol 80 que es un anticonceptivo potente y en los animales de experimentación produce esterilidad; es carcinogénico y mutagénico; contiene además el borato de sodio considerado veneno; no usado en las preparaciones medicinales. http://www.telefonica.net/web2/paramahamsa/vacunaninosalerta.htmlhttp://detenganlavacuna.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/gardasil-cervarix/
Por las razones expuesta desde el Perú, profundo, Huancayo, considero que esta vacuna es un Fraude?, Robo?, Estafa?, Burla?.
No está comprobada científicamente por el momento; su eficacia se comprobará recién los años del 2025-2030.
godo.ara@gmail.com