• Home
  • Victims
    • Vaccine Victims Memorial
    • Gardasil & Silgard
      • G / S Australasia
        • G / S Australia
        • G / S New Zealand
      • G / S Europe
        • G / S Czech Republic
        • G / S Denmark
        • G / S France
        • G / S Germany
        • G / S Ireland
        • G / S Italy
        • G / S Norway
        • G / S Scotland
        • G / S Spain
        • G / S United Kingdom
      • G / S N. America
        • G / S Canada
        • G / S Mexico
        • G / S United States
      • G / S S. America
        • G / S Brazil
        • G/S Colombia
    • Cervarix
      • Cervarix Asia
        • Cervarix India
        • Cervarix Philippines
      • Cervarix Europe
        • Cervarix Czech
        • Cervarix Netherlands
        • Cervarix Scotland
        • Cervarix Slovakia
        • Cervarix Spain
        • Cervarix UK
      • Cervarix N. America
        • Cervarix Mexico
  • Resources
    • HPV Testing Resources
      • Pre-HPV Vaccination
      • Post-HPV Vaccination
    • Medical Professionals
    • Vaccine Injury Attorneys
    • Political Action Groups
    • Vaccine Groups
    • Vaccine Victims Hotline
  • SANE Vax Press Releases
  • Videos
    • Vaccine Safety Videos
    • Vaccine Victim Videos
    • Pharma Videos
  • About
    • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Press Releases
    • SANE Vax in the News
    • Contact Us

SaneVax, Inc.

The First International HPV Vaccine Information Clearinghouse

  • NEWS
    • Government Agencies
      • African
      • Asian
      • Australasian
      • European
      • North American
      • South American
      • United Nations
      • WHO
    • Pharmaceutical Companies
      • CSL Biotherapies
      • GlaxoSmithKline
      • Inovio Pharmaceuticals
      • Liquidia Technologies
      • Merck & Co.
      • Novartis
      • Pfizer
      • Qiagen
      • Sanofi Aventis
      • Sanofi Pasteur MSD spmsd
      • Wyeth Laboratories
    • Science & Medicine
      • Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Environmental Health
      • Heavy Metal Toxicity
      • HPV Science
      • Influenza
      • Meningitis
      • Pertussis
      • Pharmaceuticals
      • Rotavirus
      • STD’s
      • Vaccine Science
      • Women’s Health
    • Vaccine Adverse Events
    • Vaccine Injury Reporting
      • VAERS
      • VAMPSS
    • Vaccine Litigation
    • Vaccine Marketing
    • Vaccine Politics/People
    • Vaccine Victims
      • Cervarix Injuries
      • DTP/DTaP Injuries
      • Fluvax Injuries
      • Fluzone Injuries
      • Gardasil / Silgard Injuries
      • Menomune Injuries
      • MMR Injuries
      • Polio Vaccine Injuries
      • Synflorix Injuries
      • Yellow Fever Vaccine
    • Vaccines
      • Anthrax
      • Breast Cancer
      • Chicken Pox
      • Cholera
      • Combination Vaccines
      • Diphtheria
      • Hepatitis B
      • HPV
      • Influenza Vaccines
      • Malaria
      • Measles
      • Meningitis Vaccines
      • MRSA
      • Mumps
      • Norovirus
      • Pertussis Vaccines
      • Pneumococcal Disease
      • Polio
      • Rotavirus Vaccines
      • Shingles
      • Smallpox
      • TB
      • Tetanus
      • Typhoid
      • Yellow Fever Vaccine
    • Vaccines and the Media
  • WORLD NEWS
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
  • RESEARCH
    • Cancer Research
    • Cervarix Vaccine
    • Gardasil/Silgard Vaccine
    • Human Pap. Research
    • Immunization Practices
    • Neurology
    • Vaccine Adjuvants
    • Vac. Ingredient Research
    • Vaccine Injuries
    • Vaccine Preservatives
    • Vaccine Related Research
    • Vaccine Safety
  • CITIZENS SPEAK
    • Cervical Cancer Debate
    • HPV Vax
      • Australian Concerns
      • Canadian Concerns
      • Irish Concerns
      • Spain Concerns
      • UK Concerns
      • United States Concerns
You are here: Home / NEWS . . . . . . . . / Science & Medicine / Vaccine Science / Press Coverage of Dr. Wakefield's Controversial Paper: Fact or Fiction?

Press Coverage of Dr. Wakefield's Controversial Paper: Fact or Fiction?

February 28, 2011 By Norma Leave a Comment

By Norma Erickson 

The press has recently been covering the public disgrace of Dr. Andrew Wakefield in regard to a research paper he published in The Lancet in 1998. This paper was recently withdrawn from publication under allegations of misconduct on the part of Dr. Wakefield.

Just last month, Dr. Scott Reuben was accused of fraud for allegedly fabricating data on no less than 21 research papers published between 1996 and 2008. The reports on Dr. Reuben were news for a few days.

The controversy regarding Dr. Wakefield’s alleged misconduct regarding a single published research paper rages on. Why the disparity? Let’s take a look at the press coverage versus some verifiable facts.

According to the press, Dr. Wakefield is almost single-handedly responsible for the current controversy over vaccine safety. The fact is vaccine safety was questioned long before Dr. Wakefield published his findings. The National Vaccine Information Center, website http://www.nvic.org/, was established in 1988 in response to thousands of parents across the United States who were concerned about the possible side effects of vaccines and the lack of comprehensive scientific research prior to their approval.

According to the press, Dr. Wakefield linked autism specifically to the combined measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine. The fact is this is not true. Read these direct quotes from Dr. Wakefield’s article that was published in “The Lancet” (volume 351) on 28 February 1998:

  • “We identified associated gastrointestinal disease and developmental regression in a group of previously normal children, which was generally associated in time with possible environmental triggers.”
  • “We did not prove an association between measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine and the syndrome described.”
  • “Further investigation is needed to examine this syndrome and its possible relation to the vaccine.”

The press condemns Dr. Wakefield for the small number of participants in his study and where they came from, even though the published paper clearly stated there were only 12 participants and that all of them were referred either by their parents, or their primary care physicians.

The press reports that “invasive procedures” were conducted on unsuspecting children. Once again, quoting directly from the paper in question, “Investigations were approved by the Ethical Practices Committee of the Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust, and parents gave informed consent.”

The press claims the results of the study are invalid because there was no “control group. Dr. Wakefield clearly addresses this issue in his once published paper saying, “intestinal and behavioral pathologies may have occurred together by chance, reflecting a selection bias in a self-referred group.”

Dr. Wakefield’s paper quoted several previous studies that indicated a “correlation between intestinal dysfunction and autism.”

He also cited several prior studies that “may support the hypothesis that the consequences of an inflamed or dysfunctional intestine may play a part in behavioral changes in some children.”

The only concern expressed by the press that could not be refuted was that Dr. Wakefield may have failed to disclose his source/sources of funding for this research. No report of any allegation was found to indicate that Dr. Wakefield stood to personally benefit from the outcome of his research.

If, indeed, the research was funded in part by an attorney looking to prove a link between the MMR vaccine and autism in children, the attorney must have been sorely disappointed to be presented with findings that only indicated “further investigation is needed………”

For the complete text of Dr. Wakefield’s controversial paper, visit this website.

For more information regarding concerns over vaccine safety, visit the National Vaccine Information Center here.

[Note: This article was written in March of 2010. The traditional press has not relented. If anything the War on Wakefield has escalated to grand proportions. One has to wonder what the purpose of pursuing these outrageous claims could possibly be. Take the time to read the original paper for yourself–become informed–make your own decision based on facts.]

Related

Filed Under: Vaccine Science, World News Tagged With: Dr. Wakefield, fact or fiction

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Us

SaneVax on FacebookSaneVax on TwitterSaneVax on LinkedInSaneVax on YoutubeSaneVax RSS Feed

Help Support SaneVax

Notice: We need your support. This massive research & presentation comes from a team of volunteers. We need your help to keep this critical information available.



SaneVax relies on support from participants like you. We are a 501 (c)(3) non-profit corporation, donations are tax deductible. Help keep this venue available and support the spirit – Thank you!

This Week’s Survivor

Iraida from Andalusia

Categories

Links

  • Creating an HPV Industry
  • File a VAERS Report
  • Gardasil and Unexplained Deaths
  • HPV Industry Timeline
  • HPV Mechanisms of Action in Women
  • HPV Vaccine Fact Sheet
  • Petition: Rescind HPV Vaccine Approval
  • Presentation to the FDA
  • Supreme Court Arguments

HPV Vaccine VAERS Reports

Description 12/14/2019  TOTAL
Disabled 3,092
Deaths 523
Did Not Recover 13,072
Abnormal Smear 695
Cervical Cancer 186
Infertility 52
Life-threatening 1,001
Emergency Room 15,419
Hospitalized 6,448
Extended Hosp. Stay 304
Serious 9,497
Total Adverse Events 64,270

Access expanded report here.

Related

Subscribe2


 

Log In

Featured Video

Mercury, Autism and the Global Vaccine Agenda

News

SaneVax News Blog!
News

Videos

Safety • Victims • Pharma
No Genetic Epidemic

Contact

Contact S.A.N.E.Vax
S.A.N.E.VAX log thumbnail

Copyright © 2025 SaneVax, Inc. · Site by TheWebElves.com a div. of KalaRhythms.org · Log in