By: Jackie Hogan
20 September 2010
Cancer was up until recently an oncological disease. Now that is changing. This does not surprise me because last year the definition of Pandemic was changed by WHO to encourage mass vaccination with the HIN1 vaccine. Prior to the swine flu scare, pandemic meant……..simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness. That definition was changed to…..pandemics can now be either be mild or severe in the illness and death they cause. We know who really benefited from the swine flu vaccine.
An article entitled, “Assessing the effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination to prevent cervical cancer: perspectives from Germany,” mentions how cervical cancer has been “converted” from an oncological disease to an infectious disease.” What has the medical model always used against infectious diseases?…….. VACCINES. The pharmaceutical companies recognize a BIG OPPORTUNITY to create more vaccines if cancer is seen as an infectious disease.
HPV vaccines are among the most expensive vaccines ever produced, and look, even when we are in a global recession millions of girls have received this costly vaccine. We are prepared to take this vaccine even though questions are arising regarding its efficacy and safety.
To quote Professor Raina MacIntyre, “As to parental acceptance of vaccinating children against what is essentially a sexually transmitted infection, a lot will depend on how the vaccine is marketed. If it is marketed as a cancer preventing vaccine, there won’t be as much resistance”
This is exactly how Gardasil and Cervarix have been marketed.
Professor zur Hausen, who shared the Nobel prize in 2008 for his work on the hpv virus, seems to believe MORE vaccines are the answer to everyone’s infections and diseases, for he suggests further Vaccines need to be developed so that infections can be prevented and he also encourages young medical researchers to focus on vaccines.
The Nobel prize is always sure to make worldwide news. When Professor zur Hausen shared the award, the world knew of his work with the HPV virus. HPV Gardasil and Merck were now a team. All the dots are connecting. Vaccines, vaccines, and more vaccines.
Return to the article “Assessing the effectiveness of HPV vaccination to prevent cervical cancer,” it states only a minute fraction of infections will lead to serious consequences. If only a minute fraction, then why are young girls being vaccinated on a global basis?
The article further states “the efficacy of the licensed vaccines to prevent cancer is unknown.” In other words, it is unknown whether vaccinations are indeed a magic bullet, a term also used recently to re-evaluate menopausal hormone therapy, the benefits of which were not magical after all. Perhaps the magic of female nature in this case is that most infections (approximately 90%) are dealt with very effectively and permanently in immune-competent young women. Therefore girls/women with HPV infections are highly unlikely to develop invasive cervical cancer. This is crucial risk information not transported affirmatively by various parties actively promoting HPV vaccination”
We are constantly being told the benefits of HPV vaccines outweigh the risks, but how can we truly make a balanced and accurate decision regarding these vaccines when the Pharmaceutical Companies are tipping the scales in their favor by not openly sharing the risk information with us? Why are they not sharing this with us? Are they afraid that if we had the information we might reject the vaccines?
I feel we are being programmed and conditioned by some within the medical model via pharmaceutical companies, to believe vaccines are our salvation from Dis-Ease, with no regard to what these toxic ingredients may be doing to our bodies.