Vaccine Truth
By Jeffry John Aufderheide | September 10th, 2011
A United States military handbook published in 1946 shows chemical compounds used in formulating the pesticide DDT are currently injected into babies.
The handbook entitled, “DDT and Other Insecticides and Repellents”, reveals Triton X-100, Tween 20, and Tween 80 were used as major components of spraying operations of DDT. Their stated purpose was to prevent separation of ingredients and increase absorption of DDT.
A major twist to the story is revealing the company owning the patent for DDT. More on that later.
Page 70 of the document states, “The studies of emulsifers have been confined primarily to their effects on the skin, since there is no hazard from ingestion and little from skin absorption and inhalation. They have also been studied to some extent from the standpoint of their relationship to increased absorption of DDT. All of those studied present little or no hazard under the conditions of use recommended, and have been approved for that purpose so far as the toxicology is concerned.” [emphasis mine]
Scientific studies on Triton X-100 and Tween 80 actually prove the statement above to be untrue, which would likely explain why studies were limited to only the effects on the skin.
Triton X-100 and Tween 80 actually cause cell suicide, called apoptosis.
Mixtures were sprayed directly onto vegetables and crops during the height of the polio epidemic in the late 1940s and early 1950s.
“What vaccines are these chemicals in?”
As a concerned parent, you may be wondering what vaccines contain these chemicals. The Centers for Disease Control website shows the chemicals mentioned above are in the following vaccines:
Tween 20 (Polysorbate 20)
- Hepatitis A (Havrix)
- Hepatitis A-B (Twinrix)
Tween 80 (Polysorbate 80)
- DtaP (Infanrix, Tripedia)
- DtaP-HebB-IPV (Pediarix)
- DtaP-Hib (TriHIBit)
- Human Papillomavirus (Gardasil)
- Influenza (Fluarix)
- Rotavirus (RotaTeq)
- Tdap (Adacel, Boostrix)
Triton X-100
- Influenza (Fluarix, Fluzone)
Excellent article with interesting and shocking information.
It does not seem to be of importance to companies, whatever they produce and however detrimental to health their products are, as long as there is money to be made.
– Not only mothers, but also fathers and other carers should be concerned and should carefully read the vaccine inserts and investigate vaccines!
Emulsifying agents reduce surface tension and are used in pesticides to prevent separation and increase absorption. They have similar functions in vaccines.
In drug targeting polysorbate 80/Tween 80 is used to assist in the delivery of certain drugs (especially psychiatric, nano-drugs or chemotherapeutic agents) across the blood-brain barrier and into the brain tissue. Polysorbates act by rendering the barrier more porous (“open it up”).
The obvious deduction is that this is likely to happen regarding vaccines so that passage of toxic substances through the barrier into the brain tissue is facilitated. Why is there
deafening silence when vaccine promoters are confronted with this fact?
It should be of special concern in the case of small children and neo-nates as their blood-brain barriers are not fully developed.
Doctor’s arrogance may be because of ignorance. These two often go together. Many vaccine critics have studied the subject for years and know far more than the average doctor.
It is disappointing and scaring to experience doctors who cannot answer questions about ingredients, interactions between them (which do occur), side effects, also relevant questions concerning several vaccines administered within a short period of time, etc.
What may be even more disappointing is doctors’ lack of interest in finding these answers.
TINY AMOUNTS OF TOXICS ARE NOT HARMLESS
Take mercury, for example. In addition to the fact that it accumulates:
“Trace amounts” of thimerosal (approximately 49% mercury) range from 0.00012% to 0.0033%.
That is equivalent to 1,200 ppb to 33,000 ppb.
Thimerosal is toxic to neurons at 1 ppb.
Those “trace amounts” are still 4 to 5 orders of magnitude higher.
CHEMICALS ARE NOT SAFE IN INJECTIONS JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE IN FOOD
Medical students learn that substances behave differently when they are injected or ingested – why do so many appear to forget this basic fact?
EVEN WATER IS NOT SAFE WHEN IT IS INJECTED
As with other substances, water behaves differently when injected, in fact it is dangerous.
Injections containing only water should never be administrated because they cause irreversible damage: hemolysis/bursting of blood cells.
That is why if injection of water is required it must be mixed with another substance to regulate isotonicity so that blood cells will not be damaged. One example of a substance which is often used for this purpose is sodium chloride. An injection of 0.9 per cent sodium choride is ideal as it presents least damage to blood cells.
These are soaps/dispersants. It is true that they dissolve cell membranes, which clearly is bad. However, the initial rationale for inclusion of these in vaccines is and was to disperse the antigens (things to show the immune system) as far and consistently as possible from the site of the shot. You wouldn’t want the antigen just to stay put or gummed up at the site of the shot. Dispersing an antigen (kind of like an allergic material to train your immune system to attack) may be good or bad. This assumes that your body has never seen the virus before, which in the case of HepB is generally true. Nobody normally has HepB, and the immune cell memory is generally naive until it is too late. The idea was to introduce harmless portions of the virus as the antigen to train the body to attack the real thing when it encounters the real thing.
The imperfections with vaccines are multifold. The adjuvants used to coax an inflammatory response sometimes cause the immune system to go bezerk and attack the body instead. The antigens introduced may be poorly designed or look identical to normal proteins in the body, causing the immune system to attack itself. If the vaccine makes the immune system attack DNA, it will attack crucial cells in which retrovirus is entrenched where it may be sitting there inactive. If for example, this a brain cell, nerve cell, or synovial cell, the immune system will suddenly attack it whereas before the immune system would have left it alone.
Mercury used to preserve vaccines certainly kills the immune system and shifts the response to Th2. Clearly this is a strange approach to preserve something designed to enhance the immune system, not kill it like mercury does. Additionally, mercury is definitely toxic to growing childrens’ brains and nervous systems.
Lastly, introducing antigen assumes that the immune system has never seen the virus before. The person may or may not have encountered the virus, but the natural way a person develops a resistance to any pathogen is to have successfully fought it off, and then stored the “blueprint” for the antibody for later. There is no way a person alive for a few years has not encountered some of these common virii for which the most common vaccines are made unless they are grown in a sterile bubble. For the rest of the exotic abnormal pathogens, it makes some sense, but for the rest of the common virus found everywhere on fomites, non-sexually such as HPV, this approach does not make sense.
It seems to me it only takes common sense to realize that injecting toxic substances into the body of an infant, child, or adult will not make or keep that person healthy. My mother, who raised 9 children, used to say, “Don’t fool with Mother Nature”–meaning that human beings should work WITH nature and not against it. It is certainly unnatural to inject foreign substances into the body. To contract a disease (such as measles or chicken pox) and recover from it is much more natural than trying to prevent a disease through vaccination. It is my understanding that there have been no studies on the effect or effects of administering multiple vaccines to a child at one time. Many people believe that the practice of vaccination is based on science. But it is not–how can it be considered scientific to inject mercury, a known neurotoxin, into the human body? The human body is amazingly complex, and I am sure that scientists do not know all there is to know about the body. There is no way to be sure, when a vaccine or vaccines are administered to a child, that there will be no harmful effects on that child. It is “a shot in the dark.” In fact, I recently read an article that said a number of babies (something like 15 or more) in Africa died after receiving a measles vaccine–it was during a measles vaccination campaign. The article said the babies’ bodies swelled up and they suffocated to death. It also said that the parents were screaming and yelling.