HPV Vaccines Exposed: Subterfuge in a Syringe?

By Norma Erickson

sanevax-logo-200pxThe Nationwide Liaison Association of Cervical Cancer Vaccine Victims and Parents in Japan, assisted by some of Japan’s best medical scientists, and a few politicians with strong morals are doing everything they can to get HPV vaccines banned from their country. These people see Gardasil and Cervarix as vaccines with an unacceptable safety profile and very little proven benefit.

Japanese safety advocates have already succeeded in getting their government officials to order both manufacturers (Merck and GlaxoSmithKline) to change the HPV vaccine package inserts to include stronger safety warnings to medical consumers regarding the possibility of ADEM, Guillain-Barre and neurological problems. (Read more here.)

Unfortunately, that is not enough. The citizens of Japan are tired of watching their young girls suffer from convulsions, seizures, partial paralysis, severe pain and a host of new medical conditions after being subjected to HPV vaccinations. (Read more here.)

Consequently, the Nationwide Liaison Association of Cervical Cancer Vaccine Victims and Parents has started a public petition to ban HPV vaccinations in Japan. The Japanese version is here. An English language version of the same petition is here.

Why are Japanese citizens against HPV vaccinations?

Merck and GlaxoSmithKline marketing experts have done an outstanding job of creating a universal fear of being ‘infected’ with HPV, Human Papillomavirus. Unfortunately, the promotional materials for Gardasil and Cervarix as cervical cancer preventatives are filled with half-truths at best – perhaps even out and out lies.

Gardasil and Cervarix are promoted as cancer vaccines. They are not! Both vaccines are designed to combat two HPV types associated with cervical cancer. Even if these vaccines do exactly what they are meant to do – eliminate the two high risk types of HPV, no one will know if the vaccines have any impact on cervical cancer for decades.

Prior to the marketing push for HPV vaccines, CIN1/2/3 were known as abnormal cells – something that needed to be observed until treatment was required. Now, they are almost always referred to as ‘pre-cancerous’ lesions. This serves no purpose other than to strike fear into the heart of almost any woman on the face of the planet. The nature of the abnormal cells has not changed, simply the terminology. No mention is made of the fact that CIN1, CIN2 and often CIN3 abnormal cells revert to normal cells without medical intervention.

The following chart illustrates these facts perfectly. There is no doubt major pharmaceutical manufacturers such as Merck and GlaxoSmithKline stay abreast of information released by the World Health Organization, particularly if that information pertains to one of their top revenue producing products. If they do, then both companies are well aware of the information in the following chart.

Pay close attention to the numbers below. You will see the figures at the bottom of the pyramid quoted all over the place. You will not see the number at the top quoted, particularly by HPV vaccine manufacturers. This is the number medical consumers need to know – it clearly shows the virtually non-existent risk posed by being ‘infected’ with so-called carcinogenic HPV.

Keep in mind this is a World Health Organization estimate which clearly states that only 0.15% of those infected with carcinogenic HPV (high-risk HPV) will ever develop cervical cancer – much less die from it.  It certainly doesn’t make a good argument for universal HPV vaccination programs, does it?

HPV-real-risk-GSK

This was originally published on a women’s health site which is jointly sponsored by Japan Vaccines Co. Ltd and GlaxoSmithKline – and can be viewed here. The site is of course in Japanese, but you can clearly see the chart on the bottom left-hand side of the page.

It’s easy to see why everyone so afraid of being ‘infected’ with HPV. The pharmaceutical companies’ marketing experts have done their job so well that no one is able to see the simple truth.

The truth is 99.85% of those exposed to carcinogenic HPV will never develop cervical cancer!

In light of this revelation, why would anyone subject themselves or their child to the potential risks of vaccination? Consider the adverse event analysis below for those in the age group 7 to 18:

HPV vax AE comparison

This chart compares the percentage of reports to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System after HPV vaccines versus the 13 other vaccines used in the same age group.

Why do HPV vaccines account for such a high percentage of the total reports? What is so different about Gardasil and Cervarix?

Pap Screening versus HPV vaccines

Pap screening and the prompt treatment of abnormal cervical cells has never caused convulsions, partial paralysis, severe neurological damage, autoimmune disorders, seizures, chronic fatigue syndrome or death.

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) was established in 1990. There are 80 vaccines FDA-approved for use in the United States. HPV vaccines account for 25% of the entire VAERS database (ages 9-26) despite the fact they have been on the market for less than seven years. This is no small ‘accomplishment’ considering Gardasil and Cervarix have been on the market such a short time.

Why add the risk of using Gardasil or Cervarix to a cervical cancer prevention program when pap screening has been proven safe and effective, particularly when the need for pap screening is not eliminated by HPV vaccine administration?

Your Choice: Medical Consumer or Guinea Pig

We live in a world where few women, if any, need ever die from cervical cancer. Why don’t governments simply concentrate on providing the already proven safe and effective means of controlling cervical cancer?

Are you willing to put pharmaceutical manufacturers and government health officials in the driver’s seat when it comes to your health or that of your children? Are you willing to trust the words of advertising campaigns built on half-truths and questionable research? Are you willing to blindly trust government health officials who get their advice from ‘experts’ with a financial stake in the vaccine game? Are you willing to put your life in the hands of people other than yourself?

If the answer to any one of the above questions is “no,” then it is high time to let the world know that you are a medical consumer – not a guinea pig.

Show the pharmaceutical companies you are willing to be an educated medical consumer. Let health officials know you and your family are not guinea pigs for the vaccine industry!

Sign one, or all, of the petitions below:

Comments

  1. To learn about some of the toxic ingredients in the HPV vaccine, may I suggest reading my Oct. 2013 book, Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com. Chapter 10 is titled “Hidden Factors About the HPV Vaccine Gardasil”. Chapter 9 is, “Is There a Hidden Infertility Factor in Vaccines?” The Foreword is written by Mayer Eisenstein, MD, JD, MPH, and the Introduction by Paul G King, PhD. Dr. King discusses the safety issues about vaccines — something no one will want to miss knowing.

  2. Even the co-inventor of the technology enabling the HPV vaccines, Professor Ian Frazer, has acknowledged that the risk of cancer associated with the HPV virus is very low. Yet mass populations of children around the world are being vaccinated with the HPV vaccines, while the long-term consequences of these vaccines are unknown.
    We need an investigation into why these very questionable vaccines are being mass-marketed, including consideration of the lack of ‘informed consent’. Start with an investigation of how the Gardasil vaccine got onto the Australian vaccination schedule. See here for more background: http://over-vaccination.net/questionable-vaccines/hpv-vax/

  3. Excellent article which deserves to be widely spread.
    The consequences of the HPV vaccines are already showing signs of a horrific scenario:
    Gigantic numbers suffering from infertility, cancer, brain damage, seizures, blood clots, disabilities, long-lasting pain, thousands of babies born with congenital anomalies, a tsunami across the world of indescribably immense suffering and deaths.

    There are fathoms of unanswered questions.
    Why are Japanese citizens against HPV vaccinations? One reason is that many are able to gain access to unbiased information. Unfortunately this is not the case for many other countries. How may strong media censorship regarding vaccine information be torn down? This is a challenge due to the fact that it is often connected to politics and corruption.

    One example is Norway where vaccine information is strongly censored. There are close connections between the pharmaceutical industry, health authorities, doctors and media. Norwegian experts received money from Merck the manufacturer to advise the government to introduce Gardasil into the children’s vaccination program.
    http://vactruth.com/2010/06/28/merck-paying-experts-gardasil/
    In addition, unknown to the population the health authorities signed a contract together with FDA and Merck to use thousands of young Norwegian girls as research objects for Gardasil studies without their knowledge.
    See 3.d)
    http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm111283.htm

    The diagram in the article showing VAERS data for HPV versus all other 13 recommended vaccines for age group 7 – 18 in USA is shocking and leads to many questions:
    CHLAMYDIA
    Is this dramatic situation due to a destabilization of microbial flora, so that when the HPV vaccine suppresses some elements others have risen to replace them – like nature playing seesaw?

    INFERTILITY
    Is the extremely worrying situation due to the fact that Gardasil contains polysorbate, a known infertility agent?
    Is l-histidine causing destabilization of the delicate hormonal balance ? Histamine is naturally produced in the body during the menstrual cycle and l-histidine may cause an overload of histamine resulting in further hormonal imbalance.

    Has the medical establishment EVER focused on fact that our bodies, especially those of young people, are strongly affected by the intricate, fluctuating balance of hormones; and that the extra burden of drugs including vaccines, may destabilize the hormonal balance?

    ABORTIONS AND CONGENITAL ANOMALIES
    Does the illustration showing the sickening influence of the HPV vaccines also include cases of abortions where the fetuses present congenital anomalies? Nature is known to abort fetuses which have weaknesses. How many fetuses are aborted because of weaknesses and deformities which are caused by the HPV vaccines?

    I contacted the European Medicines Agency for access to a study by teratologists regarding congenital deformities in connection with Gardasil. I was refused access to the study.
    http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/min-archive/min-jun06.pdf

    Thousands of young African girls who attend school are being lined up and jabbed with Gardasil. They may be pregnant without realising it. Many may give birth to deformed babies. Who cares?

    The Gardasil manufacturer Merck has subscribed for access to the well maintained registers for pregnancy outcomes and congenital anomalies for the Scandinavian countries. These figures will probably be presented as representative for other countries which do not have complete or reliable registers.
    The pregnancy register has apparently now been discontinued, implying that Merck has attained sufficient figures to manipulate and present statistics as they so wish.

    Statistics presented in the article are interesting. Those showing the tiny risk posed by being “infected” with so-called carcinogenic HPV are never officially publicized.
    “Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital” (~ Aaron Levenstein)

  4. Correction.
    It should read See 3 e) (not d) regarding the interaction between administration of GARDASIL and pregnancy outcomes:
    http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm111283.htm

  5. “HPV vaccines account for 25% of the entire VAERS database despite the fact they have been on the market for less than seven years.”

    I was thinking about this statement and I checked it out. It’s not only untrue but it’s never been true.

    http://skeptistics.blogspot.ca/2016/03/does-hpv-have-more-vaers-events-than.html

Trackbacks

  1. […] Shortly before submitting this article for publication, I received an email from Norma at SaneVax sharing with me their latest blog about what’s going on in Japan regarding the movement there to legally ban both HPV vaccines due to serious adverse reactions and events happening to Japanese girls after inoculation. You may want to read HPV Vaccines Exposed: Subterfuge in a Syringe. […]

  2. […] Norma Erickson is the President of SaneVax, where this first appeared. […]

  3. […] Shortly before submitting this article for publication, I received an email from Norma at SaneVax sharing with me their latest blog about what’s going on in Japan regarding the movement there to legally ban both HPV vaccines due to serious adverse reactions and events happening to Japanese girls after inoculation. You may want to read HPV Vaccines Exposed: Subterfuge in a Syringe. […]

Speak Your Mind

*


*