[SaneVax: Most medical consumers, and some physicians, are not aware that cell lines used in vaccine production sometimes come from aborted fetal tissues.]
From “Cell lines from aborted human fetus in vaccine production,”
by Ragnhild Madsen, vaccine questions.
Some of today’s vaccines are cultivated on cell lines from aborted human fetuses. This itself promotes ethical questions, which is further reinforced by the fact that few people have knowledge of this fact. Few parents are aware of this when they vaccinate their children, and it is unlikely that the topic is well-known among health professionals. It is reasonable to think that some people based on ethical education and religious reasons will be uncomfortable about this fact. One can question whether this issue is controversial to such a degree that it would be prudent to disclose the circumstances to the patients – in this respect their parents.
Cell lines and virus strains from aborted fetuses:
Among the cell lines that have been used we find WI-38 derived from the lung tissue of a three-month-old girl fetus. Another cell line, MRC-5 derived from lung tissue of a 14 week old male fetus. These cell lines was derived in the 60′s and 70`s, but came into use in vaccines at a later date. The vaccines that have been cultivated on these lines is rubella (German measles), varicella (chickenpox), hepatitis A and rabies.
Virus strain used in MMR vaccine rubella-component are also taken from aborted fetal tissue. This strain is called RA 27/3 and was obtained from a fetus whose mother had rubella during pregnancy and performed an abortion because of risk of fetal damage. RA 27/3 is also grown in cell line WI-38.
(PhD. John D. Graben Stein 1999)
Excellent article relating to a very important subject.
CDC admits that absence of animal DNA in vaccines cannot be guaranteed. Even if it is shown to be absent in samples from one batch it is possibly present in other units of the same batch or in a different batch.
In pharmaceutical production there are never two batches which are the same with respect to test results, be they physical, chemical or microbiological etc.
This applies to all injections/vaccines. One operates in regions, for example: the amount of an ingredient must be within +10% to – 10% of the stated amount. A certain (small) percentage from each batch is tested and it is deduced from these results whether or not the whole batch should be approved.
Excerpt from http://vactruth.com/2012/01/21/fly-in-my-vaccine-soup/ :
CDC ADMITS THAT ABSENCE OF FOREIGN DNA CANNOT BE GUARANTEED:
“- Many novel vaccines are produced in animal cell substrates, and emerging infectious diseases may theoretically be transmitted from animals to humans through these vaccines. The challenge of identifying potential adventitious agents in vaccines closely parallels the challenge of identifying the agents causing particular emerging infectious diseases.”
I have three children and the first two have been vaccinated like they were “supposed” to be according to their pediatric doctors. The third child is just over a year old and I have been highly afraid of making him take vaccines. I wasn’t aware like I am now with my two other children. Why 7 years ago when I had my first child was all this not being brought up all the time like it is now???
I’m surprised anyone could find this website. The algorithms have buried this page pretty deep. I think we all know why.