[SaneVax: The package insert for Gardasil clearly states it has not been tested for carcinogenicity, the potential to cause cancer. Although that fact should be enough to raise an eyebrow or two, there are many other unanswered questions about HPV vaccines. The article below presents many of them quite nicely.]
Gardasil May Cause Cancer
By Sandy Lunoe, VacTruth
When we see the term “cancer vaccine” in connection with the HPV (human papilloma virus) vaccine Gardasil we may naturally assume that it prevents cervical cancer, yet there is no evidence whatsoever that this is the case. (1) On the contrary, the term is incorrect because unbelievable though it may sound Gardasil may actually cause cancer. This fact is being ignored by Merck the manufacturer and other promoters including doctors and health authorities.
NOT TESTED FOR CARCINOGENICITY
Information in the package insert states that the vaccine has not been tested for carcinogenicity. (2) Why has this not been done? Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence! There appears to be no official requirement for vaccines to be tested for carcinogenicity and no incentive for manufacturers to do so. Many experts consider that vaccines are conducive towards the dramatic worldwide increase in cancer cases.
REPLACEMENT MAY CAUSE DEVELOPMENT OF CANCER
A normal phenomenon in virology is that virus strains which have been removed are replaced by new ones. It is not known by anyone, including the vaccine manufacturer whether the new virus strains are more carcinogenic than the original ones which have been removed.
The chief editor of the Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association, immunologist Charlotte Haug writes about several unanswered questions including that of replacement in her article “We Need to Talk about HPV Vaccination – Seriously”:
Abhorred vacuum. There is another serious question that may be answered sooner: what effect will the vaccine have on the other cancer-causing strains of HPV? Nature never leaves a void, so if HPV-16 and HPV-18 are suppressed by an effective vaccine, other strains of the virus will take their place. The question is, will these strains cause cervical cancer?
Results from clinical trials are not encouraging. Vaccinated women show an increased number of precancerous lesions caused by strains of HPV other than HPV-16 and HPV-18. The results are not statistically significant, but if the trend is real – and further clinical trials should tell us in a few years – there is reason for serious concern. (3)
It is tragic and ironic that this vaccine is often grossly incorrectly termed “cancer vaccine” when it may and probably does cause cancer. There is no evidence that Gardasil protects against cancer, yet many are lied to and are lead by vaccine promoters to believe this.
Many young people have died because of this scandalous vaccine. Thousands upon thousands are suffering. Many are being ignored or are not believed. In addition, thousands of relatives are in desperation and have had their lives ruined.
The promoters include Merck the manufacturer who are known for their widespread culture of corruption and criminality, health authorities, doctors, researchers, statisticians, politicians and all others who are getting their pockets lined at the expense of young peoples’ health.
The warning message is in the name – those who consider having this vaccine should first take heed and play the mixed letter game:
A girl who gets G A R D A S I L gets all mixed up and becomes A – S A D – G I R L.
A significant issue as well as to this so called vaccine, is the amounts of aluminum adjuvant it contains. This page I am referencing takes a hard look at the lack of safety data as to aluminum and aluminum vaccine adjuvants, and it comes mainly from the CDC’s own documents, and what they do admit to. One can only in view of that information, come to the conclusion that we have been mislead and lied to as to the safety of any adjuvanted vaccines.
Here:
http://www.vacfacts.info/aluminum-vaccine-adjuvant-fa/
The next question I would put forth here is this. Why has the FDA on their site, it appears they have removed the 2006 FDA VRBPAC Gardasil preapproval meeting document? That document it seems to me, proves criminal intent, because THEY CLEARLY KNEW the product could increase the chances of cancer, and as well potentially cause other HPV strains to become stronger. All the said was that Merck was to study the issues further, and approved Gardasil anyway, and now again for boys. It is all grossly irresponsible; and clearly so. Nothing gets done. Whitewashing even the HPV/DNA contamination issue, as to the claim that there is no proven harm. Already existing and unbiased science clearly shows there is potential for autoimmune dysregulation and harm. Creating more harm than good.
Natural News already in 2008 had saved a copy of that said preapproval document, in case the FDA removed it from their site; you can read a copy of it here.
http://www.vacfacts.info/the-gardasil-fda-vrbpac-preapp/
.INEFFICACY OF THE HPV VACCINE SEEN BY DOCTOR OF DEEP PERÚ
From its inception until the appearance of cervical carcinoma (UCC), takes on average 25 to 30 years, the research of this vaccine have begun in 2000, it is evident that the scientific efficacy of this new vaccine will be determined the years 2025 – 2030.
HPV not causes definitely the (CCU); at the onset of this disease involves multiple risk factors, including the suspected HPV, but scientificaly is proven by epidemiology and statistics that the sex is what generates this disease .: Mix in 130.000 nuns found not any UCC.
http://www.portalesmedicos.com/publicaciones/articles/1832/1/Epidemiologia-del-carcinoma-del-cuello-uterino.html
To accept that a virus or a bacteria causes a infection disease must unfailingly fulfill the five Koch’s postulate
http://www.xatakaciencia.com/salud/los-postulados-de-koch
1 – The agent must be present in every case of the disease and absent from healthy.
2 – The agent must not appear in other diseases.
3 – The agent to be isolated in pure culture from disease lesions.
4 – The agent of causing disease in a susceptible animal being inoculated.
5 – The agent must again be isolated lesions in experimental animals.
http://es.scribd.com/doc/44558220/MICROBIOLOGIA-1
Consequently, HPV not fulfill not any principle of Koch’s postulate. by not meeting this postulate, that is accepted as dogma in medicine, scientifically we must be ensure that the HPV is not the causative agent to the UCC..
Until August 2012 this vaccine produced only in the United States: 265.640 adverse events ( 264,162 females, 9490 males and 5290 unknow sex); permnent disability 8910( 8890 females, 90 males and 110 unknow sex), 1220 deaths (1011 females, 70 males and 140 unknow sex), abnormal PAP 4930, cervical dysplasia 1970 and cervical cancer 570
http://holyhormones.com/vaccinations/hpv-vaccine/hpv-vaccine-adverse-events-reported-to-vaers-as-of-july-13-2012/
http://therefusers.com/?s=cervarix
The Vaccine efects advers reactions (VAERS) ensures that only complaint between 1% to 10% of the adverse effects produced by this evil vaccine;this figures shown are calculated according to the statements of the VAERS: to 10%.
http://www.noticiero.enkoria.com/2011/diez-menores-que-sufrieron-reaccion-adversa-a-la-vacuna-vph-d
http://www.pop.org/content/merck-researcher-admits-gardasil-guards-against-almost-nothing-985
Dr. Harper, who contributed to the development of the vaccine by Merck, reports that the vaccine was not investigated in children under 15 years and the vaccine given to children under 11 years is a big public experiment.
http://offtheradar.co.nz/vaccines/53-researcher-diane-harper-blasts-gardasil-hpv-marketing.html
The vaccine was approved to give girls uncontaminated with HPV, Dr. Howenstinc ensures that the women are vaccinated with HPV contaminated, have the possibility to acquire a 44.6% CCU
http://www.newswithviews.com / Howenstine/james170.htm.
Merck did not disclose that the vaccine was transgenic, the Sane Vax has discovered, which is transgenic because it has been found that the vaccine is contaminated with DNA recombinant vaccine Gardasil (DNArPVH) and has raised its concerns to the president of the FDA Margaret Hamburg. The FDA replied that the vaccine will not cause any damage transgenic
http://real-agenda.com/2011/09/16/vacuna-gardasil-contaminada-con-adn-recombinante-de-vph/
http://bolsonweb.com.ar/diariobolson/detalle.php?id_noticia=26075
A vaccinated child was ill with rheumatoid arthritis, which is an autoimmune disease. 24 hours after vaccination and found that the aluminum adhered to DNArPVH, two years after vaccination and in autopsy 6 months after death in a New Zeland girl Jazmine Renata which had recibed this deadly vaccines
http://www.mecfsforums.com/index.php?topic=9331.0
Management time to get market approval of a drug the FDA is at least three years, it is a drug for cancer 15 years, but the authorization Merck had only six months and the European Medicines Agency (EMA in English) only 9 months: To introduce the vaccine are using the marketing of fear
http://mujeresenaccion.over-blog.es/article-vph-la-vacuna-del-marketing-del-miedo-67210961.ht http://mujeresenaccion.over-blog.es/article-vph-la-vacuna -of-marketing-of-fear-67210961.ht
HPV is ubiquitous; lives in wild and domestic animals, pollute us from birth, is on the doorknobs, on towels, on nails, on fomites, in gloves and specula of gynecologists,. sexual intercourse is not the only means of contamination.
http://spa.myhealthygood.com/cancer-cervical-vacuna-contra-el-vph/investigadores-descubren-el-v
HPV also lives in the 400 nm outermost of our skin and mucous membranes. ,
If you live in our skin, our immune system produces cellular and humoral immunity is acquired or that our body is self vaccinatinge by PVHs living on our skin and mucous ..
http://www.conganat.org/seap/bibliografia/HPVToday/HPVToday007SEAP.pdf
The PVHs is not distributed uniformly worldwide. It has been found that in Canada HPV 18 only reaches 3%; is more often HPV 31, in my country Peru no studies have determined that HPV types predominate; Gardasil contains 225 mcg. aluminum and Cervarix 500 mcg, that produce the Alzheimer, Parkinson and autism, produce too neurotoxic and immune system disorders (Blaylock 2012) and Polisorbato 80, a powerful contraceptive, that in experimental animals produces sterility, atrophy of the testicles and disturbance organic and funtional of the organs of the reproduction; is carcinogenic and mutagenic; also contains sodium borate considered poison unused in medicinal preparations (NLM)
http://www.telefonica.net/web2/paramahamsa/vacunaninosalerta.html http://detenganlavacuna.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/gardasil-cervarix/
Have been discovered to date 200 types of HPV; HPV is not infectious, contagious; the intercourse is not only that the persons is contaminated
http://quimicaclinicauv.blogspot.com/2006/08/virus-del-papiloma-humano.html http://www-lab.biomedicas.unam.mx/smpv/queeshpv.htm
On 22-11-2010 FDA approved Gardasil for males aged 9 to 26 to prevent warts and cancer to the anus, is overkill
http://real-agenda.com/2011/09/16/vacuna-gardasil-contaminada-con-adn-recombinante-de-vph/
http://salud.aollatino.com/2011/02/02/aprueba-fda-nueva-indicacion-vacuna-tetravalente-vph-eeuu/
For the reasons since from deep Peru Huancayo, I believe that this vaccine is a fraud?, robbery?, swindle?, rough joke?.
The HPV is not scientifically proved for the moment that produce the UCC its effectiveness shall be verified just the years of 2025-2030.
Dr. Godofredo Arauzo
E mail: godo.ara@ gmail.com
Hi,
I am a researcher and run a health blog called Hormones Matter (http://www.hormonesmatter.com/). We’ve run a number of stories on gardasil, including patient accounts. One of the latest patient accounts includes all the of the normal adverse events following gardasil- for many years post vax and then, more recently a diagnosis of thyroid cancer. I have not been able to find any research or even additional personal accounts of a possible connection between gardasil and thyroid cancer. Has anyone else/other women suffering post vaccine been diagnosed with thyroid cancer? Does anyone know of any research linking the two. We would love to run more stories and definitely research if there is any. Here is the link to the Gardasil- thyroid cancer post: http://www.hormonesmatter.com/gardasil-and-thyroid-cancer-a-personal-account/. Thanks. C
My cousin’s daughter had the shot. Her daughter was in and out of the hospital about something like 30 times. 100 percent healthy before Gardasil. Final diagnosis….THYROID CANCER! Of cour
edit… of course I cannot give out my cousin or her daughters names. That would be up to her to decide. Privacy act issues in my mind.
My daughter had the Gardasil at age 12. She is now 19 and has been diagnosed with stage 4 Rhabdomyosarcoma. Have always known she is a congenital Lyme kid, and has once again been denied testing. She has had symptoms all her little life. She was born with a fever and jaundice. Has there been any connection to this kind of cancer? Only possible infection connection I’ve found so far, reading the literature, is Cytomegalovirus. Thanks.
So sorry to hear of your daughter’s diagnosis. To the best of my knowledge, there has been no investigation conducted to determine whether or not there may be a connection between Gardasil administration and the subsequent development of cancer.
Did you ever find anything out on this? I had the Gardasil sill shot when it first came out… A month ago they found a nodule on my thyriod and it was cancerous.
In the Gardasil 9 clinical studies 5 cases of leukemia were identified. This number was much higher than expected but was not further investigated by the authorities. This is described in the EPAR report which may be found on the EMA homepage. A possible mechanism for explaining the increase in leukemia could be virus reactivation. For cancers where virus reactivation is important Gardasil may increase the frequency of these cancers if the vaccine induces virus reactivation. In the spontaneous reports for Gardasil there are more than hundred cases of shingles which is known to occur due to virus reactivation. Shingles is a very rare disease in young girls. Therefore, it seems possible that the vaccine may reactivate viruses and therefor might facilitate the development of cancer. Another indication of virus reactivation could be that the FDA saw that the number of PAPs were increased in a population which already was exposed to HPV. In these girls the vaccine has no effect. However, it is interesting to find out whether the cancer frequency is increase in girls which are already exposed to HPV virus. This signal should really be followed-up. In the clinical trials no subgrouping of adverse events was made between girls who had the infection at the time of vaccination and those girls who did not have the HPV. To conclude the possibility that the Gardasil may promote cancer development cannot be ruled out and there are possible mechanisms which could explain this how Gardasil may increase cancer. The incidence of cancer in vaccinated girls should therefore be followed up correctly with relevant methodologies.