• Home
  • Victims
    • Vaccine Victims Memorial
    • Gardasil & Silgard
      • G / S Australasia
        • G / S Australia
        • G / S New Zealand
      • G / S Europe
        • G / S Czech Republic
        • G / S Denmark
        • G / S France
        • G / S Germany
        • G / S Ireland
        • G / S Italy
        • G / S Norway
        • G / S Scotland
        • G / S Spain
        • G / S United Kingdom
      • G / S N. America
        • G / S Canada
        • G / S Mexico
        • G / S United States
      • G / S S. America
        • G / S Brazil
        • G/S Colombia
    • Cervarix
      • Cervarix Asia
        • Cervarix India
        • Cervarix Philippines
      • Cervarix Europe
        • Cervarix Czech
        • Cervarix Netherlands
        • Cervarix Scotland
        • Cervarix Slovakia
        • Cervarix Spain
        • Cervarix UK
      • Cervarix N. America
        • Cervarix Mexico
  • Resources
    • HPV Testing Resources
      • Pre-HPV Vaccination
      • Post-HPV Vaccination
    • Medical Professionals
    • Vaccine Injury Attorneys
    • Political Action Groups
    • Vaccine Groups
    • Vaccine Victims Hotline
  • SANE Vax Press Releases
  • Videos
    • Vaccine Safety Videos
    • Vaccine Victim Videos
    • Pharma Videos
  • About
    • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Press Releases
    • SANE Vax in the News
    • Contact Us

SaneVax, Inc.

The First International HPV Vaccine Information Clearinghouse

  • NEWS
    • Government Agencies
      • African
      • Asian
      • Australasian
      • European
      • North American
      • South American
      • United Nations
      • WHO
    • Pharmaceutical Companies
      • CSL Biotherapies
      • GlaxoSmithKline
      • Inovio Pharmaceuticals
      • Liquidia Technologies
      • Merck & Co.
      • Novartis
      • Pfizer
      • Qiagen
      • Sanofi Aventis
      • Sanofi Pasteur MSD spmsd
      • Wyeth Laboratories
    • Science & Medicine
      • Cancer
      • Clinical Trials
      • Environmental Health
      • Heavy Metal Toxicity
      • HPV Science
      • Influenza
      • Meningitis
      • Pertussis
      • Pharmaceuticals
      • Rotavirus
      • STD’s
      • Vaccine Science
      • Women’s Health
    • Vaccine Adverse Events
    • Vaccine Injury Reporting
      • VAERS
      • VAMPSS
    • Vaccine Litigation
    • Vaccine Marketing
    • Vaccine Politics/People
    • Vaccine Victims
      • Cervarix Injuries
      • DTP/DTaP Injuries
      • Fluvax Injuries
      • Fluzone Injuries
      • Gardasil / Silgard Injuries
      • Menomune Injuries
      • MMR Injuries
      • Polio Vaccine Injuries
      • Synflorix Injuries
      • Yellow Fever Vaccine
    • Vaccines
      • Anthrax
      • Breast Cancer
      • Chicken Pox
      • Cholera
      • Combination Vaccines
      • Diphtheria
      • Hepatitis B
      • HPV
      • Influenza Vaccines
      • Malaria
      • Measles
      • Meningitis Vaccines
      • MRSA
      • Mumps
      • Norovirus
      • Pertussis Vaccines
      • Pneumococcal Disease
      • Polio
      • Rotavirus Vaccines
      • Shingles
      • Smallpox
      • TB
      • Tetanus
      • Typhoid
      • Yellow Fever Vaccine
    • Vaccines and the Media
  • WORLD NEWS
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
  • RESEARCH
    • Cancer Research
    • Cervarix Vaccine
    • Gardasil/Silgard Vaccine
    • Human Pap. Research
    • Immunization Practices
    • Neurology
    • Vaccine Adjuvants
    • Vac. Ingredient Research
    • Vaccine Injuries
    • Vaccine Preservatives
    • Vaccine Related Research
    • Vaccine Safety
  • CITIZENS SPEAK
    • Cervical Cancer Debate
    • HPV Vax
      • Australian Concerns
      • Canadian Concerns
      • Irish Concerns
      • Spain Concerns
      • UK Concerns
      • United States Concerns
You are here: Home / Media / About / SANE Vax Press Releases / The Vaccine Safety Debate: Journalism or Propaganda?

The Vaccine Safety Debate: Journalism or Propaganda?

November 15, 2012 By Norma 1 Comment

By Norma Erickson

Vaccine Debate: Journalism or Propaganda?

When it comes to the debate surrounding vaccine safety, efficacy and need, fair and balanced journalism may be a thing of the past.

In the 1920’s, American Philosopher John Dewey believed journalists should do more than simply pass on information. The Principles of Journalism for the 21st century clearly state that journalism’s first obligation is to the truth; its first loyalty is to its citizens. Do these principles apply to news reports on vaccine issues or, has the media fallen into the trap of simply passing on information?

According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, propaganda is “the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor (talk or opinion widely disseminated with no discernible source) for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person.” How prevalent is propaganda when it comes to ‘news reports’ about vaccine safety, efficacy and/or need?

In today’s fast paced, money driven world, the guiding principles of journalism appear to be largely a thing of the past. Consider the following categories of Journalistic Ethics Violations:

  • Misleading Definitions and Terminology – using terms and definitions in a way that implies accepted fact. No story is fair if it misleads or deceives the reader.
  • Imbalanced Reporting – choosing to report ‘certain’ stories over others, or to the exclusion of others, allows the media to control access to information and manipulate the public.
  • Opinions Disguised as News – Analysis and commentary are often misrepresented as facts. Facts are documentable, opinions are usually not.
  • Selective Omission – Failure to provide proper context, attribution and background information can dramatically distort the truth. No news story is fair if it omits facts of major importance or significance.
  • Distortion of Facts – usually a result of failure to verify information prior to publication.
  • Omission of Facts – failure to tell all of the truth, so far as it can be learned.
  • The Use of Unreliable Sources – conflicts of interest need to be disclosed, as well as source documents. Reports which omit these relevant facts should be suspect.
  • Misleading Headlines – using headlines and/or ‘teasers’ that have little or no relevance to the context of the publication/broadcast.
  • Unreported News

How many times have you seen ‘news reports’ that exhibit any of the above listed violations? More importantly, what can you do about these violations?

“Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist’s credibility. Members of the Society share a dedication to ethical behavior and adopt this code to declare the Society’s principles and standards of practice.”

The time has come to hold the media accountable for violations of their own code of ethics. It’s easier than you may think. Simply use the following guidelines:

  1. Pay attention to the news via print, radio and television.
  2. When you see a news report that contains ethics violations, file an official letter of complaint. The Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics can be found here.
  3. Your letter should include an opening paragraph containing:
    1. Name of media outlet
    2. Name of the reporter/author
    3. Date and time of publication
    4. Internet link, if applicable
    5. Subsequent points should be made in order in which they appear in the program/media etc – state what was written or stated followed by your statement as to how/why this violates their code of ethics, for example:
      • Accuracy – any false statements
      • Balance – failure to give equal weight to opposing views
      • Failure to disclose conflicts of interest (media, reporter or expert quoted)
      • Using unpublished or undisclosed research
      • Failing to meet their own editorial standards (most media outlets have these standards available on their website)
    6. Tell them what you want them to do:
      • Retraction
      • Apology
      • Follow-up story presenting opposing viewpoint, etc…
      • Provide them with a specific date by which you expect a response
    7. Tell them what you plan to do if they do not respond, such as:
      • Contact local media watchdog organization
      • Contact their parent organization
      • Contact the Better Business Bureau
      • Contact the Federal Communications Commission (or other appropriate authority)
      • Contact government authorities
    8. Send your letter and follow-up as needed.

It has become painfully obvious that the traditional media is not going to live up to the standards they have set for themselves. No matter what the reason is for this lapse of ethics, you can do something about it. 

Do not sacrifice truth on the altar of inaction. Be aware – protect your right to fair, balanced and accurate news.

Related

Filed Under: SANE Vax Press Releases, Vaccines, Vaccines and the Media, World News Tagged With: journalism, propaganda, vaccine debate

Comments

  1. Sandy Lunoe says

    November 15, 2012 at 2:56 pm

    Important article giving excellent and sensible advice. This should be part of school education!

    When I contacted the Norwegian Journalist Association and asked them why all information published in the media about vaccines is unbalanced and biased they replied that their function is to publish “the facts”.

    I wrote back and drew attention to the situation that the health authorities, who have the monopoly for information about vaccines admit to having close connections with the pharmaceutical industry and I asked if journalists took this into account. They did not answer.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Us

SaneVax on FacebookSaneVax on TwitterSaneVax on LinkedInSaneVax on YoutubeSaneVax RSS Feed

Help Support SaneVax

Notice: We need your support. This massive research & presentation comes from a team of volunteers. We need your help to keep this critical information available.



SaneVax relies on support from participants like you. We are a 501 (c)(3) non-profit corporation, donations are tax deductible. Help keep this venue available and support the spirit – Thank you!

This Week’s Survivor

vaccine science?

Warning: Gardasil injuries can have a permanent impact

Categories

Links

  • Creating an HPV Industry
  • File a VAERS Report
  • Gardasil and Unexplained Deaths
  • HPV Industry Timeline
  • HPV Mechanisms of Action in Women
  • HPV Vaccine Fact Sheet
  • Petition: Rescind HPV Vaccine Approval
  • Presentation to the FDA
  • Supreme Court Arguments

HPV Vaccine VAERS Reports

Description 12/14/2019  TOTAL
Disabled 3,092
Deaths 523
Did Not Recover 13,072
Abnormal Smear 695
Cervical Cancer 186
Infertility 52
Life-threatening 1,001
Emergency Room 15,419
Hospitalized 6,448
Extended Hosp. Stay 304
Serious 9,497
Total Adverse Events 64,270

Access expanded report here.

Related

Subscribe2


 

Log In

Featured Video

alive

I’m Alive

News

SaneVax News Blog!
News

Videos

Safety • Victims • Pharma
No Genetic Epidemic

Contact

Contact S.A.N.E.Vax
S.A.N.E.VAX log thumbnail

Copyright © 2025 SaneVax, Inc. · Site by TheWebElves.com a div. of KalaRhythms.org · Log in

 

Loading Comments...