20th October 2010 – By Joel Lord
Toxicity is defined in the Medical lexicon as “a condition that results from exposure to a toxin or to toxic amounts of a substance that does not cause adverse effects in smaller amounts.” Vaccine-induced toxicity, while similar in some respects to this model, requires a deeper understanding in terms of its overall effect on the human body.
Most practicing MD’s recognize Mercury & Aluminum to be severe neuro-toxins. Still, pediatricians & family doctors routinely recommend their patients (including babies, young children, pregnant women & the elderly) receive the full/partial schedule of standard immunization shots available.
How many of these doctors have examined the package inserts accompanying each vaccine? And if so how many have considered the synergy factor that occurs when combining multiple ingredients such as heavy metals, live viruses (or strands of DNA/RNA “heat treated virus”), anti-biotics, formaldehyde, detergent, diploid cells, phenol dye & excipient buffers; their synergistic long-term impact on the body’s delicate network of immune, endocrine, nervous, circulatory, lymphatic & digestive system operations?
In a closed door meeting conducted by the CDC in 2000, doctors alluded to their concerns over heavy metal toxicity in vaccines; while acknowledging a glaring void in scientific research on this neglected aspect of synergy,
“Aluminum & mercury are often simultaneously administered to infants, both at the same site & at different sites. However, there is absolutely no data, including animal data, about the potential for SYNERGY, additively or antagonism, all of which can occur in binary metal mixtures that relate and allow us to draw any conclusions from the simultaneous exposure to these two salts in vaccines.” Dr. Johnston
In the same breath Johnson also stressed the necessity of using aluminum as an adjuvant (immune stimulant) in vaccines,
“Aluminum salts are important in the formulating process of vaccines, both in antigen stabilization and absorption of endotoxin.”
“But from all of the other studies of toxic substances, the earlier you work with the central nervous system, the more likely you are to run into a sensitive period for one of these effects, so that moving from one month or one day of birth to six months of birth changes enormously the potential for toxicity. There are just a host of neurodevelopmental data that would suggest that we’ve got a serious problem. The earlier we go, the more serious the problem.” Dr. Weil
This is a glaring example of medical hypocracy in action – such rampant blind trust in long-held beliefs ingrained in medical students throughout their formal training; which thus extends in real practice to the clinics & hospitals we frequent as trusting patients.
Compare this to another professionally held viewpoint.
‘In 1927, Dr. Victor Vaughn, a toxicologist with the University of Michigan, testified before the Federal Trade Commission that “all salts of aluminum are poisonous when injected subcutaneously or intravenously”. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, “Aluminum is now being implicated as interfering with a variety of cellular & metabolic processes in the nervous system and in other tissues. In 1997 The New England Journal of Medicine published data showing that premature babies injected with aluminum build up toxic levels in the blood, bones and brain, and that aluminum toxicity can lead to neurological damage, including mental handicaps at 18 months of age.” Neil Miller
Leave a Reply